test: Benchmark

[Byloth]

https://github.com/ddmills/js-ecs-benchmarks

[Byloth]

Primo benchmark ^(04/11/2025)

µECS ^(v1.0.21)

Suite Add/Remove (5000 iterations)
  - piecs            9ns     47319ns    25010000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - harmony-ecs     12ns     60267ns    25010000 updates      27.4% slower
  - wolf-ecs        13ns     64376ns    25010000 updates      36.0% slower
  - bitecs          15ns     73564ns    25010000 updates      55.5% slower
  - uecs            24ns    119611ns    25010000 updates     152.8% slower
  - perform-ecs     31ns    155052ns    25010000 updates     227.7% slower
  - javelin-ecs     34ns    172496ns    25010000 updates     264.5% slower
  - miniplex        35ns    174854ns    25010000 updates     269.5% slower
  - yagl-ecs        50ns    248000ns    25010000 updates     424.1% slower
  - goodluck        51ns    255573ns    25010000 updates     440.1% slower
  - picoes          53ns    262879ns    25010000 updates     455.5% slower
  - geotic          57ns    284013ns    25010000 updates     500.2% slower

  + micro-ecs       61ns    306668ns    25010000 updates     548.1% slower

  - tiny-ecs        83ns    415571ns    25010000 updates     778.2% slower
  - nano-ecs       113ns    566741ns    25010000 updates    1097.7% slower
  - ape-ecs        280ns   1400860ns    25010000 updates    2860.5% slower
  - ecsy           868ns   4341422ns    25010000 updates    9074.8% slower

Suite Destroy (100000 iterations)
  - goodluck         0ns      8151ns       0.0% fastest
  - piecs            0ns     11339ns      39.1% slower
  - wolf-ecs         0ns     15361ns      88.5% slower
  - uecs             0ns     49250ns     504.3% slower
  - miniplex         1ns     57276ns     602.7% slower
  - harmony-ecs      1ns     66567ns     716.7% slower
  - bitecs           1ns     69009ns     746.7% slower
  - picoes           1ns     70548ns     765.6% slower
  - javelin-ecs      1ns     77457ns     850.3% slower
  - tiny-ecs         1ns     99483ns    1120.6% slower

  + micro-ecs        1ns    104168ns    1178.1% slower

  - perform-ecs      1ns    130256ns    1498.1% slower
  - nano-ecs         1ns    132667ns    1527.7% slower
  - geotic           2ns    195069ns    2293.3% slower
  - ape-ecs          3ns    258107ns    3066.8% slower
  - yagl-ecs        12ns   1247576ns   15206.7% slower
  - ecsy            15ns   1544666ns   18851.7% slower

Suite Velocity (2000 iterations)
  - wolf-ecs         3ns      5991ns     2001000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - piecs            3ns      6603ns     2001000 updates      10.2% slower
  - harmony-ecs      4ns      7731ns     2001000 updates      29.1% slower
  - bitecs           4ns      8652ns     2001000 updates      44.4% slower
  - uecs             6ns     12580ns     2001000 updates     110.0% slower
  - geotic           7ns     13741ns     2001000 updates     129.4% slower
  - javelin-ecs      8ns     16154ns     2001000 updates     169.7% slower
  - perform-ecs      8ns     16964ns     2001000 updates     183.2% slower
  - picoes           9ns     17724ns     2001000 updates     195.9% slower
  - miniplex         9ns     17906ns     2001000 updates     198.9% slower
  - goodluck         9ns     18623ns     2001000 updates     210.9% slower
  - tiny-ecs        16ns     32427ns     2001000 updates     441.3% slower
  - yagl-ecs        16ns     32873ns     2001000 updates     448.7% slower

  + micro-ecs       20ns     39323ns     2001000 updates     556.4% slower

  - nano-ecs        22ns     44812ns     2001000 updates     648.0% slower
  - ape-ecs         58ns    116088ns     2001000 updates    1837.8% slower
  - ecsy           175ns    349530ns     2001000 updates    5734.6% slower

[Byloth]

Secondo benchmark ^(05/01/2026)

µECS ^(v1.0.26)

Suite Add/Remove (5000 iterations)
  - piecs           16ns     81581ns    25010000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - harmony-ecs     18ns     87878ns    25010000 updates       7.7% slower
  - wolf-ecs        19ns     94592ns    25010000 updates      15.9% slower
  - bitecs          21ns    105049ns    25010000 updates      28.8% slower
  - uecs            32ns    160710ns    25010000 updates      97.0% slower
  - perform-ecs     47ns    236909ns    25010000 updates     190.4% slower
  - miniplex        55ns    275988ns    25010000 updates     238.3% slower
  - javelin-ecs     59ns    294950ns    25010000 updates     261.5% slower
  - picoes          70ns    350751ns    25010000 updates     329.9% slower
  - yagl-ecs        74ns    370065ns    25010000 updates     353.6% slower
  - goodluck        75ns    374848ns    25010000 updates     359.5% slower

  + micro-ecs       95ns    473346ns    25010000 updates     480.2% slower

  - geotic          98ns    489024ns    25010000 updates     499.4% slower
  - ecsy           120ns    598580ns    25010000 updates     633.7% slower
  - tiny-ecs       126ns    631137ns    25010000 updates     673.6% slower
  - nano-ecs       163ns    816226ns    25010000 updates     900.5% slower
  - ape-ecs        427ns   2132502ns    25010000 updates    2514.0% slower

Suite Destroy (100000 iterations)
  - goodluck         0ns      9543ns       0.0% fastest
  - piecs            0ns     18458ns      93.4% slower
  - wolf-ecs         0ns     18849ns      97.5% slower
  - bitecs           1ns     74358ns     679.2% slower
  - miniplex         1ns     84637ns     786.9% slower
  - uecs             1ns     84880ns     789.4% slower
  - harmony-ecs      1ns     98308ns     930.1% slower
  - picoes           1ns    110621ns    1059.2% slower
  - javelin-ecs      1ns    128451ns    1246.0% slower
  - tiny-ecs         1ns    145233ns    1421.8% slower
  - nano-ecs         2ns    185833ns    1847.3% slower

  + micro-ecs        2ns    188662ns    1876.9% slower

  - perform-ecs      2ns    205076ns    2048.9% slower
  - geotic           3ns    305401ns    3100.2% slower
  - ape-ecs          5ns    493867ns    5075.0% slower
  - yagl-ecs        19ns   1919882ns   20017.7% slower
  - ecsy            22ns   2195475ns   22905.5% slower

Suite Velocity (2000 iterations)
  - piecs            5ns      9078ns     2001000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - harmony-ecs      5ns      9906ns     2001000 updates       9.1% slower
  - wolf-ecs         5ns     10084ns     2001000 updates      11.1% slower
  - bitecs           7ns     13829ns     2001000 updates      52.3% slower
  - yagl-ecs         9ns     17101ns     2001000 updates      88.4% slower
  - uecs            10ns     20510ns     2001000 updates     125.9% slower
  - miniplex        11ns     22675ns     2001000 updates     149.8% slower
  - perform-ecs     12ns     23126ns     2001000 updates     154.8% slower
  - geotic          12ns     23741ns     2001000 updates     161.5% slower
  - javelin-ecs     13ns     25076ns     2001000 updates     176.2% slower
  - picoes          13ns     26148ns     2001000 updates     188.0% slower
  - goodluck        14ns     27014ns     2001000 updates     197.6% slower

  + micro-ecs       23ns     45412ns     2001000 updates     400.3% slower

  - ecsy            24ns     47030ns     2001000 updates     418.1% slower
  - tiny-ecs        25ns     50387ns     2001000 updates     455.1% slower
  - nano-ecs        32ns     63685ns     2001000 updates     601.6% slower
  - ape-ecs         84ns    168487ns     2001000 updates    1756.1% slower

---

Piccola nota personale

Mi danno l'impressione di essere risultati completamente a caso. Non riproducibili in maniera sistematica.
Per la cronaca: test eseguiti sulla stessa macchina, nelle stesse condizioni, senza aver cambiato nulla.

[Byloth]

Terzo benchmark ^(10/01/2026)

µECS ^(v1.0.27)

Suite Add/Remove (5000 iterations)
  - piecs           15ns     76423ns    25010000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - harmony-ecs     18ns     87946ns    25010000 updates      15.1% slower
  - wolf-ecs        19ns     92926ns    25010000 updates      21.6% slower
  - bitecs          20ns    102374ns    25010000 updates      34.0% slower
  - perform-ecs     42ns    208047ns    25010000 updates     172.2% slower
  - uecs            43ns    213267ns    25010000 updates     179.1% slower
  - javelin-ecs     57ns    283618ns    25010000 updates     271.1% slower

  + micro-ecs       59ns    296899ns    25010000 updates     288.5% slower

  - miniplex        61ns    304194ns    25010000 updates     298.0% slower
  - goodluck        71ns    357020ns    25010000 updates     367.2% slower
  - picoes          73ns    364876ns    25010000 updates     377.4% slower
  - yagl-ecs        83ns    414651ns    25010000 updates     442.6% slower
  - geotic          89ns    443508ns    25010000 updates     480.3% slower
  - ecsy           118ns    591915ns    25010000 updates     674.5% slower
  - tiny-ecs       122ns    612080ns    25010000 updates     700.9% slower
  - nano-ecs       177ns    885770ns    25010000 updates    1059.0% slower
  - ape-ecs        434ns   2172245ns    25010000 updates    2742.4% slower

Suite Destroy (100000 iterations)
  - goodluck         0ns      9040ns       0.0% fastest
  - piecs            0ns     17669ns      95.5% slower
  - wolf-ecs         0ns     20104ns     122.4% slower
  - uecs             1ns     75462ns     734.7% slower
  - miniplex         1ns     76433ns     745.5% slower
  - harmony-ecs      1ns     78773ns     771.4% slower
  - bitecs           1ns     84856ns     838.6% slower
  - javelin-ecs      1ns     97598ns     979.6% slower
  - picoes           1ns    102871ns    1037.9% slower

  + micro-ecs        1ns    129604ns    1333.6% slower

  - tiny-ecs         2ns    150414ns    1563.8% slower
  - nano-ecs         2ns    194496ns    2051.4% slower
  - perform-ecs      2ns    216763ns    2297.8% slower
  - geotic           3ns    293651ns    3148.3% slower
  - ape-ecs          5ns    496065ns    5387.3% slower
  - yagl-ecs        19ns   1906210ns   20985.9% slower
  - ecsy            21ns   2057837ns   22663.1% slower

Suite Velocity (2000 iterations)
  - wolf-ecs         4ns      8551ns     2001000 updates       0.0% fastest
  - piecs            4ns      8856ns     2001000 updates       3.6% slower
  - harmony-ecs      5ns      9706ns     2001000 updates      13.5% slower
  - bitecs           6ns     11914ns     2001000 updates      39.3% slower
  - uecs             9ns     17464ns     2001000 updates     104.2% slower
  - yagl-ecs         9ns     17589ns     2001000 updates     105.7% slower

  + micro-ecs       10ns     19796ns     2001000 updates     131.5% slower

  - miniplex        10ns     20824ns     2001000 updates     143.5% slower
  - geotic          11ns     21209ns     2001000 updates     148.0% slower
  - perform-ecs     11ns     21681ns     2001000 updates     153.6% slower
  - picoes          12ns     23562ns     2001000 updates     175.5% slower
  - goodluck        13ns     25784ns     2001000 updates     201.5% slower
  - javelin-ecs     14ns     28268ns     2001000 updates     230.6% slower
  - tiny-ecs        23ns     45181ns     2001000 updates     428.4% slower
  - ecsy            23ns     45749ns     2001000 updates     435.0% slower
  - nano-ecs        27ns     54504ns     2001000 updates     537.4% slower
  - ape-ecs         82ns    164059ns     2001000 updates    1818.6% slower