Package name

[florianhartig]

Have we decided on a final package name? There's https://github.com/griffithdan/r3PG, but this is not on CRAN, so we COULD use the same name, but it still might lead to confusion.

So, are we staying with threePGN? I find it a bit difficult to write?

Alternatively, as the other package is called r3PG, r3PGN would be free.

If we have decided on the package name, we should also change the repo name.

[trotsiuk]

We haven't so far, at least we didn't discussed it. I don't feel it is fair to use r3PG, even those this would be the best name. I was a bit in contact with Dan, and they aimed to submit it to CRAN. We can also call it e.g. r3PGm where m stands for mix, or r3PGf with f-fortran