Skip to content

Change geometric shape bounded adjacency count information from absolute to relative? #23

@wrtobin

Description

@wrtobin

I think faces, edges, vertices, etc are fine names to use, but generally should be defined in terms of the dimensionality of the main geometric type.

So e.g. for an N-cube we'd talk about the N-1-faces, N-2-edges, and N-3-vertices.

So the definition of e.g. the numFaces function shouldn't be numMCubes< 2 >(), it should be based on the dimensionality of the current type and be numMCubes< DIM - 1 >().

We can also have an absolute version numAdjacent< DIM >() which replicates the current implementation (which may get more use generally).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions