Skip to content

Wording on Revolutionary Party question #44

@flameoguy

Description

@flameoguy

After answering that workers should control the means of production (the word 'own' is used), users are presented with:

"Should there be a revolutionary party to teach the masses during and after the revolution?"

Answering yes puts you on the path for Bordigism and De Leonism, while answering no puts you on the path towards Council Communism and Situationism. The goal seems to be differentiating on whether the user agrees with the party dictatorship, whether the working class should be organized into a formal party to advance their demands and theoretical development.

Neither Bordiga nor De Leon considered a revolutionary party to be a part of communist society. They consider the party to be an organ of the working class for the purpose of achieving communism. After the revolution, the party would be unnecessary as the class conflict would be resolved.

The question could read "Should the working classes be organized into a revolutionary party?" and discard the nonsense about 'teaching the masses'.

Source: https://libcom.org/article/bordiga-versus-pannekoek-antagonism-0

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions