Subsection categories suggestion

[markwilkinson]

Describe the typo or text issue

Suggest the following sub-sections here:

Assessment Platforms
Catalogs and Registries
Tooling
Standards

Page or file location

https://github.com/OSTrails/docs/tree/commons-deliverable-m24/docs/commons/FAIR

Additional context

No response

[andresTabiTuwien]

@markwilkinson do you know what pages we want to list en each sub-section ?

[markwilkinson]

Assessment Platforms

• FAIR-Champion
• FOOPS

Catalogs and Registries

• Catalogue-of-Benchmark-Scoring-Algorithms
• Catalogue-of-Benchmarks
• Catalogue-of-Metrics
• Catalogue-of-Tests.
• FAIR-commons
• FAIRsharing

Tooling

• FAIR-Assessment-Authoring-Tool

Standards

• Guidance-Element-Specification
• Assessment-Component-Application-Profile
• Assessment-Recommended-AP
• Core-Assessment-Profile.
• FAIR-Test-Results-Vocabulary-FTR
• LifeWatch-FAIR-Assessment-Profile
• Thematic-DO-Specific-Guidance-Elements

[dgarijo]

FAIROs would also go under assessment platforms

[TomMiksa]

Hi,

I would suggest we separate the Tools from Commons. Specific tools should not go under the commons. We should keep the tools in the documentation, but on a different level.

I would suggest that we do it this way:

That is, putting Tools on the same level as Commons, but not underneath. Within the tools, we can group them again by pillar, i.e., DMP, SKG, FAIR, etc.

My suggestion is based on a fact that neither DAMAP nor Argos are DMP Commons, They are DMP Platforms that implement commons. In the same way tools listed for FAIR, implement commons or may even be a place that host commons, but are not commons themselves.

[markwilkinson]

Sounds good to me!