Skip to content

outdated text specification for table limits? #2058

@redianthus

Description

@redianthus

Hi,

My understanding of the memory64 proposal is that, now, memory limits can be up to 2^48 (because the limit is in number of pages), but the table limits could be 2^64. But if you read the prose or the formal typing rules specification here, it looks like they are outdated and still refer to the limit being 2^32-1. Am I right about supposing this is simply outdated?

Best,

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions