Investigate the different C++ ports of OpenTLD

[aismail]

From the following points of view:

• functionality (mainly, if they function correctly)
• deployability (how simple it is to deploy, what are the dependencies?). Preferably NO DEPENDENCY (a.k.a. the webcam video fetch should be separate from the tracking library itself)
• simplicity of binary generation (it shouldn't be too complicated to obtain the binary, and yes, we hate complicated make-like systems)
• speed (should run at 10 fps at least)

A wiki page should be written with a very short comparison between them. A good starting point is the OpenTLD Google group: http://groups.google.com/group/opentld

[aismail]

Also, maybe the port doesn't care about the 10 000 frames to track total limitation.

[aismail]

Existing ports:

• BPTLD: https://github.com/Ninjakannon/BPTLD
• OpenTL: http://www.opentl.org/index.html (nu e port de OpenTLD, dar merita vazut)
• BPTLD without Matlab dependency: https://github.com/anikita/openTLD
• alantrrs: https://github.com/alantrrs/OpenTLD
• QOpenTLD: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qopentld/

Also to try:

• my Matlab version that is used in Java
• the official Matlab version

[aismail]

Finally, we decided upon Allantrr's port.