gatekeeping at arxiv #11
Description
This seems like a gatekeeping tactic, and as much as I love using techrxiv for my preprints with, say, the Recursive Transformer Model (RTM) preprint, that paper deserves to be in Arxiv, as it has been peer reviewed. To say otherwise is lying to the public, so in what way do you want to approach this issue with you?
x.com/drqsatoshin is the X profile in question, I am Doctor, I have plenty of research that is getting used in AI development that uses Mixture of Recursion and the Tiny Recursive Model that you have as a paper from JM with her white paper as an independent engineer and research, so why am I not allowed?
Is it not robust enough for you? Because there have been multiple times you all could have come to X's Spaces lectures with Mr. Kneen, a known innovator with AnthropicAI using similar memory modeling, and with the knowledge base graphing community.
Oh, and if you're wondering, no-- I didn't use AI to type this out, I have done the hard work over the past few years on this work with the University of Colorado Boulder and it deserves the merit where the merit is worth giving.
I hope maybe the resolution will be that somehow I procure endorsement on your side of this gate and we can come to an agreement, otherwise we will take this discourse publicly, though it will be civil.
Regards, Dr. Q.