We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
1 parent 3d8aafa commit 4d3d9aaCopy full SHA for 4d3d9aa
README.md
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ Replacement for the 'bazel coverage' command:
3
- we don't accidentally bust the analysis cache with 'coverage' flags differing from 'test'
4
- forget having a Bazel-specific, Java-based, unmaintained LCOV merger and 'combined report' - that never should have been Bazel's job
5
- developers really need git-aware diff to show "incremental coverage" - which of the lines I added or modified are covered by tests?
6
+- ability to add other enforcement thresholds
0 commit comments