Skip to content

Improvement: Fix a TODO in concurrent_table.hpp #322

@Reneg973

Description

@Reneg973

I tried to replace std::unordered_map with boost::concurrent_flat_map and saw a memory footprint I could not explain. It was easy to find this line:
using multimutex_type=multimutex<mutex_type,128>; // TODO: adapt 128 to the machine

Can this be fixed?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions