potential issues when using it in real life

[ccloquet]

(contributed by a practitioner)

• danger respective to the caller that he is wrongly ranked as a
  rubberneck by other people at the emergency location
• mobile data volume isn't free of charge
• feeling of oppression by a patient being filmed during an emergency
  might be a problem
• data protection issues

But of course I also see the advantages for the emergency services by
receiving live informations by video. And some of the problems can be
solved by regulations.

[ccloquet]

Instead of the hard and unproductive "do not film" we hear today, would it make sense to educate the citizens somehow in the following way ?

"1. SECURITY - ensure your security and the security of the victims before all,
2. CALL 112
3. give FIRST AID if possible,
4. depending on the situation, you can FILM with the UTTERMOST RESPECT. In that case, stream to 112 instead of Snapchat or Youtube -- the images will help us to assess the situation. Filming with respect means that no victim is identifiable and that the video is not publicly available. Always follow the instructions of the first responders"

(this is a first attempt to spark the discussion, it should certainly be refined and above all debated with the citizens themselves -- practical realization may depend on the community -- this shows that a technical solution calls for a discussion between people, and the discussion itself has interest)