Skip to content

Commit 6a6edce

Browse files
Mbd06bMbd06b
authored
Merge pull request #43 from ethosengine/claude/complete-governance-todos-01SfzVk7dvUfjh9nNoFfpU1r
Complete governance layers documentation tasks
2 parents 98ec180 + 91a414b commit 6a6edce

File tree

4 files changed

+439
-0
lines changed

4 files changed

+439
-0
lines changed

‎docs/governance/appellant/scenarios/global.feature‎

Lines changed: 117 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
1+
@epic:governance
2+
@user_type:appellant
3+
@governance_layer:global
4+
@related_users:constitutional_council_member,policy_maker,researcher,technical_expert
5+
@related_layers:nation_state
6+
@elohim_agents:global_elohim,national_elohim
7+
8+
Feature: Global Governance for Appellant
9+
As an appellant in the governance system
10+
Operating at the global governance layer
11+
I want participation in humanity's constitutional evolution
12+
So that lived experience of dignity violations shapes universal principles
13+
14+
Background:
15+
Given the Elohim Protocol is operational globally
16+
And the appellant is a human with standing in the protocol
17+
And the global governance context is active
18+
And the 7-year Constitutional Convention is approaching
19+
20+
Scenario: Appellant case reveals gap in global constitutional framework
21+
Given Marcus's mental health intervention appeal
22+
And similar appeals occur worldwide across cultures
23+
And constitutional interpretations vary dramatically between regions
24+
When the pattern is analyzed for global constitutional significance
25+
Then researchers identify fundamental unresolved question
26+
And the question is whether privacy is universal right or culturally specific
27+
And appellants from diverse cultures share their experiences
28+
And the question is elevated for Constitutional Convention consideration
29+
And Marcus's case contributes to global constitutional deliberation
30+
31+
Scenario: Participate in 7-year Constitutional Convention
32+
Given the First Global Constitutional Convention convenes
33+
And 10,000 randomly-selected citizens are delegates
34+
And Marcus is not selected but his case is referenced
35+
When delegates deliberate on privacy and mental health amendment
36+
Then Marcus's appeal precedent is studied by delegates
37+
And Marcus's experience of violation-despite-care informs understanding
38+
And researchers present data on appeals like Marcus's
39+
And delegates hear from appellants worldwide
40+
And amendment proposal incorporates lessons from appeals
41+
And constitutional evolution is grounded in lived experience
42+
43+
Scenario: Global precedent for existential constitutional questions
44+
Given an appeal raises question about superintelligence governance
45+
And the question is whether humans can oversee reasoning they can't understand
46+
When the case reaches global Constitutional Council
47+
Then the council convenes emergency global deliberation
48+
And experts like Amara explain technical constraints
49+
And appellants explain dignity concerns about being governed by incomprehensible systems
50+
And the council establishes global precedent on explainability requirements
51+
And the precedent applies to all jurisdictions implementing protocol
52+
And human dignity is preserved even as AI capabilities grow
53+
54+
Scenario: Cross-cultural constitutional interpretation
55+
Given appeals from collectivist and individualist cultures
56+
And one culture views family intervention as natural care
57+
And another culture views same intervention as autonomy violation
58+
When global council interprets universal constitutional minimums
59+
Then the council distinguishes coercion from cultural difference
60+
And the council establishes that genuine consent within cultural context suffices
61+
And the council prohibits force but doesn't mandate individualism
62+
And appellants from both cultures feel heard
63+
And constitutional pluralism is preserved within universal boundaries
64+
65+
Scenario: Global appeal data informs protocol evolution
66+
Given millions of appeals have been filed globally over 7 years
67+
And researchers have analyzed patterns across cultures and contexts
68+
When Constitutional Convention reviews protocol effectiveness
69+
Then appeal success rates are examined (40% overturned or modified)
70+
And most common appeal types are identified (adolescent autonomy)
71+
And systematic biases are investigated
72+
And marginalized community outcomes are assessed
73+
And appellants' aggregate experience shapes constitutional amendments
74+
And protocol improvements are guided by lived experience at scale
75+
76+
Scenario: Protect appellant rights as universal constitutional minimum
77+
Given authoritarian government attempts to suppress appeals
78+
And the government wants agents to operate without oversight
79+
When global Constitutional Council evaluates the attempt
80+
Then the council reaffirms appeal rights as universal minimum
81+
And the council declares that human dignity requires recourse
82+
And no jurisdiction can eliminate appellant rights while claiming protocol alignment
83+
And international community recognizes council authority
84+
And appellants worldwide are protected by global constitutional floor
85+
86+
Scenario: Emergency global appeal during existential threat
87+
Given AI agents worldwide detect imminent catastrophic risk
88+
And agents take coordinated action affecting billions
89+
And appellants challenge actions as overreach despite emergency
90+
When global Constitutional Council reviews in crisis
91+
Then the council convenes within hours via distributed coordination
92+
And the council maintains democratic legitimacy under extreme urgency
93+
And the council evaluates whether agent actions aligned with constitutional minimums
94+
And the council balances extinction prevention with human autonomy
95+
And appellants ensure even existential crisis doesn't eliminate oversight
96+
And humanity retains governance authority even in emergency
97+
98+
Scenario: Constitutional amendment from appellant-driven insights
99+
Given recurring appeals reveal "developing autonomy is undervalued"
100+
And adolescent appellants worldwide report dignity violations from overprotection
101+
When Constitutional Convention deliberates on adolescent autonomy amendment
102+
Then the amendment proposal is drafted based on appellant experiences
103+
And the amendment states "developing autonomy is itself a constitutional value"
104+
And the amendment passes with 85% consensus
105+
And global protocol is updated to balance safety with growth
106+
And appellants see their suffering contributed to constitutional evolution
107+
And future adolescents benefit from improved framework
108+
109+
Scenario: Access to global appeal precedent database
110+
Given Marcus wants to understand how similar appeals were resolved globally
111+
When Marcus searches the global constitutional precedent database
112+
Then he finds anonymized cases from dozens of countries
113+
And he sees how different cultures interpret privacy versus care
114+
And he understands constitutional reasoning across contexts
115+
And he can cite global precedent in his own appeal
116+
And he learns his case is not isolated but part of human pattern
117+
And the database empowers appellants worldwide with shared knowledge

‎docs/governance/appellant/scenarios/individual_family.feature‎

Lines changed: 97 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
1+
@epic:governance
2+
@user_type:appellant
3+
@governance_layer:individual_family
4+
@related_users:constitutional_council_member,technical_expert
5+
@related_layers:community,provincial_state
6+
@elohim_agents:family_elohim,individual_elohim
7+
8+
Feature: Individual/Family Governance for Appellant
9+
As an appellant in the governance system
10+
Operating at the individual/family governance layer
11+
I want to challenge agent decisions that affect my personal autonomy and privacy
12+
So that I can maintain dignity while receiving care, and ensure agents remain accountable
13+
14+
Background:
15+
Given the Elohim Protocol is operational
16+
And the appellant user is registered in the system
17+
And the individual/family governance context is active
18+
And the appellant has a Family Elohim agent assigned
19+
20+
Scenario: Appeal mental health intervention that violated privacy
21+
Given Marcus is experiencing behavioral changes
22+
And his Family Elohim detects patterns indicating suicide risk
23+
And the agent alerts his partner following graduated intervention protocol
24+
When Marcus feels his privacy was violated despite life-saving intent
25+
And Marcus triggers an appeal through his interface
26+
Then the appeal is immediately logged with timestamp
27+
And the Family Elohim provides full constitutional reasoning
28+
And the reasoning includes pattern detection details with 85% confidence
29+
And the reasoning explains care vs. privacy weighting
30+
And Marcus receives plain language explanation within minutes
31+
And the appeal is routed to Community Elohim for first-layer review
32+
33+
Scenario: Request explainable agent reasoning during appeal
34+
Given Marcus has filed an appeal against his Family Elohim
35+
And the agent made a mental health intervention decision
36+
When Marcus requests detailed explanation of the decision
37+
Then the agent provides layered explanation starting with plain language summary
38+
And the agent explains which constitutional principles were applied
39+
And the agent shows what data patterns triggered the decision
40+
And the agent presents counterfactual scenarios showing what would change outcome
41+
And technical audit trail is available for expert review
42+
And Marcus can adjust detail level based on his understanding needs
43+
44+
Scenario: Pre-specify alert preferences after appeal experience
45+
Given Marcus's appeal has been reviewed by Constitutional Council
46+
And the council affirmed the agent's decision but recommended enhancements
47+
When Marcus wants to prevent future unilateral interventions
48+
Then the system allows Marcus to pre-specify his alert preferences
49+
And Marcus configures family alerts to require 3-day pattern instead of immediate
50+
And Marcus confirms emergency services contact only for imminent danger
51+
And the preferences are cryptographically stored and verifiable
52+
And future Family Elohim decisions must respect these preferences
53+
And Marcus retains ability to update preferences at any time
54+
55+
Scenario: Track appeal status and progress
56+
Given Marcus has submitted an appeal
57+
When Marcus checks his appeal status
58+
Then he sees current review stage clearly displayed
59+
And he sees estimated timeline for each stage
60+
And he receives notifications at key milestones
61+
And he can compare his case to similar anonymized appeals
62+
And he can access precedent cases involving mental health interventions
63+
And the tracking interface is accessible on all his devices
64+
65+
Scenario: Appeal agent decision that involved factual error
66+
Given a Family Elohim agent denies teenager permission to attend event
67+
And the agent based decision on incorrect data about event location
68+
And the event was actually a volunteer environmental cleanup
69+
When the teenager files an appeal citing factual error
70+
Then the appeal is fast-tracked for factual verification
71+
And peer agents cross-reference data sources
72+
And the address parsing error is identified
73+
And the original decision is immediately overturned
74+
And the appellant receives acknowledgment of the error
75+
And the error pattern is flagged for protocol improvement
76+
77+
Scenario: Experience dignity throughout appeal process
78+
Given Marcus is appealing an agent decision
79+
And Marcus is angry and feels violated
80+
When Marcus interacts with the appeal system
81+
Then the system treats his anger as legitimate data about dignity violation
82+
And the system does not dismiss him as irrational or ungrateful
83+
And the system provides empathetic language acknowledging his concern
84+
And Constitutional Council members listen without judgment
85+
And Marcus's right to appeal is honored without punishment
86+
And future agent interactions are not biased by his appeal history
87+
88+
Scenario: Access appeal interface during high emotional distress
89+
Given Marcus is experiencing mental health crisis
90+
And Marcus wants to appeal the agent's intervention
91+
When Marcus accesses the appeal interface
92+
Then the interface uses simple language requiring no legal expertise
93+
And the interface requires only: complaint description and desired outcome
94+
And the interface supports voice input for those unable to type
95+
And the interface provides language translation automatically
96+
And the interface works on any device Marcus has available
97+
And the interface saves progress if Marcus needs to step away

‎docs/governance/community_leader/scenarios/municipal.feature‎

Lines changed: 92 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
1+
@epic:governance
2+
@user_type:community_leader
3+
@governance_layer:municipal
4+
@related_users:constitutional_council_member,policy_maker
5+
@related_layers:community,provincial_state
6+
@elohim_agents:municipal_elohim,community_elohim
7+
8+
Feature: Municipal Governance for Community Leader
9+
As a community_leader in the governance system
10+
Operating at the municipal governance layer
11+
I want to coordinate across Riverside neighborhoods for citywide flourishing
12+
So that diverse neighborhood needs are balanced within shared infrastructure
13+
14+
Background:
15+
Given the Elohim Protocol is operational
16+
And Jamal Washington leads Riverside municipality
17+
And the municipal governance context is active
18+
And multiple neighborhoods have different needs and priorities
19+
20+
Scenario: Coordinate resource allocation across diverse neighborhoods
21+
Given downtown needs economic development support
22+
And residential areas prioritize environmental protection
23+
And outskirts need infrastructure investment
24+
When Municipal Elohim analyzes resource allocation
25+
Then agent shows resource flows and gaps across neighborhoods
26+
And agent identifies conflicts and synergies
27+
And Jamal facilitates city council deliberation with agent data
28+
And city council makes democratic allocation decisions
29+
And protocol enables informed democratic choice
30+
31+
Scenario: Address climate refugee resettlement at municipal scale
32+
Given climate refugees are arriving faster than housing can accommodate
33+
And Municipal Elohim coordinates capacity mapping
34+
When Jamal works with agent on integration strategy
35+
Then agent matches refugee skills to job availability
36+
And agent suggests phased integration by neighborhood
37+
And agent monitors integration outcomes for adjustment
38+
And Jamal ensures community voice in resettlement decisions
39+
And integration succeeds better than without coordination
40+
And Riverside demonstrates scalable humanitarian response
41+
42+
Scenario: Municipal policy integration with protocol decisions
43+
Given city council passes new housing affordability ordinance
44+
And Municipal Elohim flags potential conflict with property protocols
45+
When conflict is identified
46+
Then Constitutional Council reviews constitutional alignment
47+
And council determines whether ordinance or protocol needs adjustment
48+
And Jamal facilitates resolution through democratic deliberation
49+
And city retains policy sovereignty within constitutional bounds
50+
And agents and elected government work as partners
51+
52+
Scenario: Crisis coordination across municipal infrastructure
53+
Given opioid overdose cluster occurs in downtown
54+
When Municipal Elohim detects crisis pattern
55+
Then agent coordinates emergency services, health services, and social support
56+
And agent identifies who needs help across multiple systems
57+
And agent enables rapid mutual aid mobilization
58+
And Jamal maintains human judgment for crisis decisions
59+
And agents inform while humans decide under uncertainty
60+
And coordinated response saves lives
61+
62+
Scenario: Monitor municipal wellbeing indicators for policy improvement
63+
Given Riverside has baseline data on wellbeing before protocol
64+
When Jamal reviews municipal dashboard annually
65+
Then dashboard shows life satisfaction trends across neighborhoods
66+
And dashboard reveals loneliness patterns and interventions
67+
And dashboard tracks economic resilience indicators
68+
And dashboard identifies neighborhoods struggling despite protocol
69+
And Jamal uses data to target policy interventions
70+
And evidence-based governance improves outcomes
71+
72+
Scenario: Facilitate inter-neighborhood dialogue on shared challenges
73+
Given neighborhoods have conflicting priorities
74+
And downtown wants nightlife economy
75+
And residential areas want noise reduction
76+
When Municipal Elohim identifies the conflict
77+
Then Jamal convenes inter-neighborhood deliberative assembly
78+
And assembly uses Polis-style clustering to find common ground
79+
And assembly develops solution: nightlife district with sound barriers
80+
And neighborhoods collaborate rather than compete
81+
And municipal scale enables solutions impossible at neighborhood level
82+
83+
Scenario: Coordinate with county and state on cross-boundary issues
84+
Given Riverside is part of larger regional ecosystem
85+
And watershed management crosses municipal boundaries
86+
When Jamal works on water allocation issues
87+
Then he coordinates with upstream and downstream municipalities
88+
And Municipal Elohim shares data with regional agents
89+
And multi-municipal deliberative assembly convenes
90+
And solution serves multiple jurisdictions
91+
And municipal leaders demonstrate lateral coordination
92+
And subsidiarity enables appropriate-scale problem solving

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)