Is project dead?

[yarikoptic]

given absent activity in github in the past 2 years, I wondered if may be project is no longer developed/supported? Would be nice to have some note on top of README reflecting that then.

[jmsuhy]

I’m one of its original founders of ONgDB, I’ve now shifted my focus to DozerDB (GPLv3), which adds enterprise features to Neo4j Core via a bootstrapping plugin approach — taking a different path from ONgDB's fork approach. Although I can’t speak on behalf of the graph foundation, I plan to devote most of my open source efforts to DozerDB going forward.

[bradnussbaum]

The biggest issue we are hearing from companies in adopting ONgDB is the fear of litigation. Whether that fear is merited or not, based on the open sources licenses that the repository is governed under, would only be determined by a court of law which no company wants to deal with as the outcomes carry a high risk and a heavy cost to get to them. However, most companies also don't want to be in a market with little to no competition to control prices, which is what has happened. High licensing costs have become a barrier for many organizations in adopting graph. The way forward seems simple enough: everyone supports the development of an open source native graph database. The work needs a team of dedicated, skilled engineers. With no outside support we do what we can.

[ArmanMirzaei]

another problem is integrity of all. i am a fan of these, but wished the file system, the git, the table database, the object/graph database, were all one.