From 5d7dbf95b7ccbd97522d5cedb803478fd64e84c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Radouane Khouadri <redouane.khouadri_externe@rte-france.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:02:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] remove check for acceptableDuration

---
 .../securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx       | 4 +---
 .../securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts    | 8 ++------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx b/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx
index 67b3ebcc81..ae460aaf2d 100644
--- a/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx
+++ b/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx
@@ -35,9 +35,7 @@ export const SecurityAnalysisResultN: FunctionComponent<SecurityAnalysisResultNP
                       limitType: intl.formatMessage({
                           id: limitViolation?.limitType,
                       }),
-                      // TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
-                      acceptableDuration:
-                          limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
+                      acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
                       limitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation?.limitName, intl),
                       limit: limitViolation?.limit,
                       value: limitViolation?.value,
diff --git a/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts b/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts
index 9768c64cc1..b230d82f84 100644
--- a/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts
+++ b/src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts
@@ -131,9 +131,7 @@ export const flattenNmKResultsContingencies = (intl: IntlShape, result: Constrai
                 nextLimitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.nextLimitName, intl),
                 side: limitViolation.side ? intl.formatMessage({ id: limitViolation.side }) : '',
                 linkedElementId: contingencyId,
-                // TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
-                acceptableDuration:
-                    limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
+                acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
                 upcomingAcceptableDuration:
                     limitViolation?.upcomingAcceptableDuration === MAX_INT32
                         ? null
@@ -169,9 +167,7 @@ export const flattenNmKResultsConstraints = (intl: IntlShape, result: Contingenc
                     limitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.limitName, intl),
                     nextLimitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.nextLimitName, intl),
                     side: limitViolation.side ? intl.formatMessage({ id: limitViolation.side }) : '',
-                    // TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
-                    acceptableDuration:
-                        limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
+                    acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
                     upcomingAcceptableDuration:
                         limitViolation?.upcomingAcceptableDuration === MAX_INT32
                             ? null