Missing owl:FunctionalProperty in GS1 Vocabulary Fields

[anishjain1401]

The owl:FunctionalProperty is often desired for certain fields in the GS1 WebVoc. However, it appears to be missing/not specificed in some cases in the version 1.11 (found at https://github.com/gs1/WebVoc/blob/master/v1.11/gs1Voc_v1_11.jsonld).

For example, the productName field is defined as follows:
{
"@id": "gs1:productName",
"@type": [
"rdf:Property",
"owl:DatatypeProperty"
],
"rdfs:comment": {
"@language": "en",
"@value": "Consumer friendly short description of the product suitable for compact presentation."
},
"rdfs:domain": {
"@id": "gs1:Product"
},
"rdfs:isDefinedBy": {
"@id": "gs1:"
},
"rdfs:label": {
"@language": "en",
"@value": "Product Name"
},
"rdfs:range": {
"@id": "rdf:langString"
},
"rdfs:subPropertyOf": {
"@id": "schema:name"
},
"skos:related": {
"@id": "schema:Product"
},
"sw:term_status": "stable"
}

To help improve it further, I plan to review all fields in the vocabulary and identify any similar corrections that may be needed.
Let me know your thoughts!

[mgh128]

Hi Anish,

Thanks for looking into this. I'm aware that there are probably some gaps or errors.
At https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WIuSC4d7wqBhYnMFy3og4y_uaqPNXxonPRNnS5-ZPzM/edit?usp=sharing there is a spreadsheet that lists every property, its rdfs:range and whether it is currently declared as a functional property. You could fill in another column with your remarks for anything where you see an error. I'll then take a look and we can submit a work request to fix the errors and fill in the gaps. Many thanks in advance for your help with this.

Best wishes

Mark

[anishjain1401]

Hi Mark,

Thank you for providing the spreadsheet. I’ll review the properties, check for any errors or missing declarations, and add my remarks in the new column as suggested. Once completed, I’ll share an update.

Thanks again for your guidance!

Best regards,
Anish

[anishjain1401]

Hi Mark,

I hope you're doing well.

As per your suggestions, we’ve updated the spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WIuSC4d7wqBhYnMFy3og4y_uaqPNXxonPRNnS5-ZPzM/edit?gid=0#gid=0).
We’ve added remarks with respect to the functional property and rdfs:range.

Could you please review it and share your feedback?

Thank you!
Best regards,
Anish