You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 28, 2019. It is now read-only.
Currently, Set::remove*() returns a boolean indicating whether the element(s) being removed were found. We need a variant of this operation that throws if the element is not found.
I'd prefer to rename the existing operations to discard*() and change remove*() into the strict variants. This matches Python's set type and some others, however this is a BC break with very little justification. So failing that we need to come up with a good name and I tend to dislike things like removeStrict()... what's it being strict about? Further to that 'strict' already has a pretty specific meaning in set theory.