From 3be45170df9f2f5723a086d1cc1dcbd7132b2a8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Per=20Gr=C3=B6n?= <per@retone.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:27:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in
 radTInteraction::EmptyVectOfPtrToListsOfTrans

It seems that iterating starting from 1 is a simple typo here. It
causes the two objects that are first in these two arrays not to
be deallocated.

The objects were allocated in radTInteraction::CountMainRelaxElems.
---
 cpp/src/core/radintrc.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cpp/src/core/radintrc.h b/cpp/src/core/radintrc.h
index 3797eec8..efbf7862 100644
--- a/cpp/src/core/radintrc.h
+++ b/cpp/src/core/radintrc.h
@@ -266,14 +266,14 @@ inline void radTInteraction::PushFrontNativeElemTransList(radTg3d* g3dPtr, radTl
 
 inline void radTInteraction::EmptyVectOfPtrToListsOfTrans()
 {
-	for(unsigned i=1; i<IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.size(); i++) 
+	for(unsigned i=0; i<IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.size(); i++)
 	{
 		radTlphgPtr*& p_lphgPtr = IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr[i];
 		if(p_lphgPtr != 0) delete p_lphgPtr;
 		p_lphgPtr = 0;
 	}
 	IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.erase(IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.begin(), IntVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.end());
-	for(unsigned k=1; k<ExtVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.size(); k++) 
+	for(unsigned k=0; k<ExtVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr.size(); k++)
 	{
 		radTlphgPtr*& p_lphgPtr = ExtVectOfPtrToListsOfTransPtr[k];
 		if(p_lphgPtr != 0) delete p_lphgPtr;