Building and building_part schema

[Azbesciak]

Hi, I am mapping buildings and parts.
Below is the actual (runtime) schema for buildings (excluding bbox, version, type and filename)

root
 |-- id: string (nullable = true)
 |-- geometry: geometry (nullable = true)
 |-- sources: array (nullable = true)
 |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |-- property: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- dataset: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- record_id: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- update_time: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- confidence: double (nullable = true)
 |-- subtype: string (nullable = true)
 |-- class: string (nullable = true)
 |-- names: struct (nullable = true)
 |    |-- primary: string (nullable = true)
 |    |-- common: map (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- key: string
 |    |    |-- value: string (valueContainsNull = true)
 |    |-- rules: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |-- variant: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- language: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- value: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- between: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |    |-- element: double (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |-- side: string (nullable = true)
 |-- level: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- has_parts: boolean (nullable = true)
 |-- height: double (nullable = true)
 |-- is_underground: boolean (nullable = true)
 |-- num_floors: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- num_floors_underground: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- min_height: double (nullable = true)
 |-- min_floor: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- facade_color: string (nullable = true)
 |-- facade_material: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_material: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_shape: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_direction: double (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_orientation: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_color: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_height: double (nullable = true)

and below is for parts

root
 |-- id: string (nullable = true)
 |-- geometry: geometry (nullable = true)
 |-- sources: array (nullable = true)
 |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |-- property: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- dataset: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- record_id: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- update_time: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- confidence: double (nullable = true)
 |-- names: struct (nullable = true)
 |    |-- primary: string (nullable = true)
 |    |-- common: map (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- key: string
 |    |    |-- value: string (valueContainsNull = true)
 |    |-- rules: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |-- variant: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- language: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- value: string (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- between: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |    |-- element: double (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |-- side: string (nullable = true)
 |-- level: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- height: double (nullable = true)
 |-- is_underground: boolean (nullable = true)
 |-- num_floors: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- num_floors_underground: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- min_height: double (nullable = true)
 |-- min_floor: integer (nullable = true)
 |-- facade_color: string (nullable = true)
 |-- facade_material: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_material: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_shape: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_direction: double (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_orientation: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_color: string (nullable = true)
 |-- roof_height: double (nullable = true)
 |-- building_id: string (nullable = true)

As you see these are different because I load them separately for the theme and type.
But - should names be there, for parts? I do not see them in the parts schema.

No namesContainer as for buildings

[atiannicelli]

We originally did not have names for parts as we were not sure what the use case was for them, but then later decided to make the two more consistent by adding that in. I believe the latest parts schema should have name in it. Sorry this was not answered earlier.