Request for clarification on Phantom chain integration criteria (Solaxy SVM L2)

[Marcolist]

Hi Phantom team 👋,

I’m reaching out to better understand Phantom’s process and criteria for supporting new chains.

I recently opened PR #300 to add Solaxy, an SVM-compatible Layer-2, but the PR was closed without feedback. I’d genuinely appreciate clarification so we can align with Phantom’s expectations going forward.

About Solaxy:

• ✅ Live production mainnet
• ✅ SVM-compatible (Solana-style accounts & programs)
• ✅ Active DEX (Neptoon) and Launchpad (Igniter)
• ✅ Full public RPC infrastructure
• ✅ Hyperlane bridge to Solana and Ethereum
• 🚧 Validator network currently rolling out

We’re already running production infrastructure and indexers and are happy to provide:

• Test wallets / RPC endpoints
• Technical documentation
• Engineering support during integration

Questions we’d love clarity on:

1. What are Phantom’s criteria or requirements for integrating a new SVM-compatible chain?
2. Is there a formal application or review process (beyond PRs)?
3. Are there specific metrics or milestones (TVL, users, validators, audits, etc.) Phantom looks for?
4. Is Phantom currently open to non-Solana SVM chains, or is support intentionally limited?

We’re not asking for special treatment — just guidance on what’s required (or whether support isn’t planned at all), so we don’t waste time on blind PRs.

Thanks for your work on Phantom — it’s the primary wallet we’d like Solaxy users to rely on.

Happy to continue the discussion here or move it to a more appropriate channel if needed.

Best regards
Marco