Research Practices: Code management and sharing

[demidenm]

The code review section is extremely sparse. Who should review code -- co-authors? Lab members? How should the review take place -- skim the code or complete reproducibility? Given recent error, to what extent should the reproduction/review take place? Would be good to include some discussions from Ted's scuba diving perspective?

Code sharing -- once a file is ready, providing the structure and format, either list an example tree of an "optimal" imaging or/and behavioral folder, would be good to get people going.