/new webgroup issue command

[JedHazaymeh]

Add a /new command so members can add an issue to the Webgroup backlog, from the Discord server.

Requirements

• Add a Github API (or Octokit) module to get/post data on Webgroup repositories.

[HypnoAnt]

A blockbot service account may need to be specified for this to work to be able to submit the issues. The user could be specified based on their discord username.

[JedHazaymeh]

A blockbot service account may need to be specified for this to work to be able to submit the issues. The user could be specified based on their discord username.

I believe @wizzdom mentioned a RBCmt account, but I think a Webgroup service account would be more suitable (for the name but also for permissions).

[JedHazaymeh]

The website has an abstraction layer that uses the Github API to pull Markdown from repos, which I considered extracting into a common resource: useful for cases like this.

The implementation uses Javascript, so it would need to be extracted into a simple REST API (like github-adapter, etc) so non-Javascript services (blockbot) can use it.

[wizzdom]

A blockbot service account may need to be specified for this to work to be able to submit the issues. The user could be specified based on their discord username.

I believe @wizzdom mentioned a RBCmt account, but I think a Webgroup service account would be more suitable (for the name but also for permissions).

Yes, I guess it depends on the use case, we could either use a tightly controlled GitHub token on the RBCmt account or will use a separate webgroup service account. Will have to have a look into github access tokens and how tightly we can limit them in scope.