Toolkit Strategy

[BenjaminRCooper]

I know @georgerichmond raised this within the meeting to have people rolling on and off the toolkit, but I do think this potentially causes a problem in terms of conventions being interrupted differently, consistency may become an issue and also scope of the project has to be passed around.

I personally feel if we have core maintainers and create a good velocity behind it, the culture of the toolkit will gain traction. I understand the reason that the toolkit died previously because we lost the core maintainers, but it should have been the case that a guild was in place to allow the scope to exist within that, and new maintainers were brought in.

Thoughts?