From 32430060d6a29a4bb0fead24f79d45f66e6c33a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 21:24:59 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add section on resource usage trade-offs.

---
 index.html | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 7998b394..51a71e25 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -5026,6 +5026,24 @@ <h2>Level of Assurance</h2>
 href="#privacy-considerations"></a> is applicable for such extensions.
       </p>
     </section>
+
+    <section>
+      <h2>Resource Usage Trade-offs</h2>
+
+      <p>
+This specification does not require or suggest the use of any specific type of
+<a>verifiable data registry</a>. Different use cases might result in different
+requirements. Different requirements might suggest different resource usage
+trade-offs. For example, trade-offs between computation (energy usage), trust
+(deference to authority), coordination (network bandwidth), or memory (physical
+storage) might be appropriate for a certain threat model. Other threat models
+might not make the same trade-offs. Those that need to consider resource usage
+trade-offs for their threat models are directed to the <a
+href="https://www.w3.org/TR/did-rubric/">DID Method Rubric</a>, which provides
+evaluation criteria to help decision makers evaluate whether or not a particular
+<a>verifiable data registry</a> is appropriate for their use cases.
+      </p>
+    </section>
   </section>
 
   <section class="informative">

From 0038960a3d98aad6b75f90516f5caee59c607803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 21:29:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Explicitly mark the trade-offs section as informative.

---
 index.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 51a71e25..22b8c546 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -5027,7 +5027,7 @@ <h2>Level of Assurance</h2>
       </p>
     </section>
 
-    <section>
+    <section class="informative">
       <h2>Resource Usage Trade-offs</h2>
 
       <p>

From 253768cfb1ffae44bc7c4268575676348606f544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:51:20 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Apply suggestions on competing considerations.

Co-authored-by: Joe Andrieu <joe@andrieu.net>
---
 index.html | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 22b8c546..ec263ca4 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -5028,20 +5028,20 @@ <h2>Level of Assurance</h2>
     </section>
 
     <section class="informative">
-      <h2>Resource Usage Trade-offs</h2>
+      <h2>Evaluating Competing Considerations</h2>
 
       <p>
 This specification does not require or suggest the use of any specific type of
 <a>verifiable data registry</a>. Different use cases might result in different
-requirements. Different requirements might suggest different resource usage
+requirements. Different requirements might suggest different considerations with different
 trade-offs. For example, trade-offs between computation (energy usage), trust
 (deference to authority), coordination (network bandwidth), or memory (physical
-storage) might be appropriate for a certain threat model. Other threat models
-might not make the same trade-offs. Those that need to consider resource usage
-trade-offs for their threat models are directed to the <a
+storage) might or might not be appropriate, for any given use case. Other use cases
+might not make the same trade-offs. Those that need to consider different criteria
+for their use case are directed to the <a
 href="https://www.w3.org/TR/did-rubric/">DID Method Rubric</a>, which provides
 evaluation criteria to help decision makers evaluate whether or not a particular
-<a>verifiable data registry</a> is appropriate for their use cases.
+<a>DID Method</a> is appropriate for their use cases.
       </p>
     </section>
   </section>

From e95f2b33d16606bb6a4ea211082f4b9e8e68f235 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:43:59 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Fix wording in competing considerations section.

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
---
 index.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index ec263ca4..2f16b181 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -5036,11 +5036,11 @@ <h2>Evaluating Competing Considerations</h2>
 requirements. Different requirements might suggest different considerations with different
 trade-offs. For example, trade-offs between computation (energy usage), trust
 (deference to authority), coordination (network bandwidth), or memory (physical
-storage) might or might not be appropriate, for any given use case. Other use cases
+storage) might or might not be appropriate for any given use case. Other use cases
 might not make the same trade-offs. Those that need to consider different criteria
 for their use case are directed to the <a
 href="https://www.w3.org/TR/did-rubric/">DID Method Rubric</a>, which provides
-evaluation criteria to help decision makers evaluate whether or not a particular
+evaluation criteria to help decision makers determine whether or not a particular
 <a>DID Method</a> is appropriate for their use cases.
       </p>
     </section>