Skip to content

Misleading name for supertype references #63

@yawkat

Description

@yawkat

yawkat: btw, when clicking the >> link, the titles are a bit misleading :D
yawkat: like clicking the ">>" next to Renderable, I would expect to see sub-types, but it says "Super type" :D
Maldivia: the >> shows usages of that thing, and it's used as a supertype
i guess it is misleading but it's consistent with the other usage types
a small "Used as" would help clear things up :D
yea, and theres more than enough room for it. i'll add it

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions