Skip to content

Conversation

@e1Ru1o
Copy link
Contributor

@e1Ru1o e1Ru1o commented Jan 21, 2026

No description provided.

@e1Ru1o e1Ru1o requested a review from duncancmt January 21, 2026 09:50
@e1Ru1o e1Ru1o self-assigned this Jan 21, 2026
@e1Ru1o e1Ru1o marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 15:24
@immunefi-magnus
Copy link

🛡️ Immunefi PR Reviews

We noticed that your project isn't set up for automatic code reviews. If you'd like this PR reviewed by the Immunefi team, you can request it manually using the link below:

🔗 Send this PR in for review

Once submitted, we'll take care of assigning a reviewer and follow up here.

function RFQ_VIP(
address recipient,
ISignatureTransfer.PermitTransferFrom memory takerPermit,
ISignatureTransfer.PermitTransferFrom memory makerPermit,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you document the constraint that the permit must be the 2nd argument for all VIP actions somewhere in this file?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

upon further reflection, I wonder if it's possible to enforce this in CI by reviewing the artifact produced by compiling the interface

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in a separate PR (#486) so this one can be merged independently of that script

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants