Enhance CodeRabbit Solidity Review Instructions for Smart Contract Governance in .coderabbit.yaml

[kumawatkaran523]

Added additional review and testing guidelines for contract logic modifications and test coverage.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• Documentation

  • Enhanced Solidity code review guidelines with comprehensive checks for test coverage, access control enforcement, event validation, security considerations (reentrancy and input validation), and architectural consistency.

• Chores

  • Updated review configuration to enforce stricter testing standards for smart contract changes.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

Walkthrough

The pull request expands the CodeRabbit configuration file's Solidity review guidance to include checks for test coverage, access control, event emissions, reentrancy risks, input validation, gas optimization, and architectural consistency when reviewing smart contracts and their tests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration Updates .coderabbit.yaml	Expanded Solidity code review checks including test coverage requirements, access control validation, event emission verification, security concerns (reentrancy, input validation), and test scenario comprehensiveness for Solidity files and test files.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested labels

Documentation

Poem

🐰 A config so fine, with wisdom to share,
Solidity checks now handled with care,
Access and events, security too,
Testing completeness—a reviewer's breakthrough!
CodeRabbit hops, ensuring code's right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title references governance but focuses on expanding Solidity review instructions, which matches the main change of adding comprehensive review and testing guidelines to .coderabbit.yaml.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 211-220: Remove the duplicate "gas optimization opportunities"
entry (line with "Confirm gas optimization opportunities are considered") so it
appears only once; consolidate "no security-sensitive logic changes without
tests" into the stronger checklist item "Verify that any modification to
contract logic includes corresponding automated test updates" (merge the two
into one authoritative line); refine "reentrancy risks and improper input
validation" to a more specific actionable item such as "Check for specific
reentrancy patterns (cross-function, callback/read-only reentrancy) and validate
input checks" instead of the broad overlap with "security vulnerabilities and
best practices"; and remove the unverifiable "confirm new features were
discussed in an issue" line and replace it with an actionable requirement like
"Require a linked issue reference in the PR description (enforceable via
pre_merge_checks)" so CodeRabbit can check for the link rather than attempting
to verify external discussions.