Skip to content

[MrBot] Add test cases (parameterized tests) #268

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
mattdurak wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[MrBot] Add test cases (parameterized tests) #268

mattdurak wants to merge 1 commit into from
+140 −0

Conversation

@mattdurak
Copy link
Contributor

@mattdurak mattdurak commented Jan 16, 2026

Usage:

  PARAMETERIZED_TEST_FUNCTION(base_name,
      ARGS(type1, param1, type2, param2),
      CASE((value1, value2), suffix1),
      CASE((value3, value4), suffix2))
  {
      // test code using param1, param2
  }

mattdurak
mattdurak commented Jan 16, 2026
View reviewed changes
inc/testrunnerswitcher.h
#define DISABLED_TEST_FUNCTION(name) void name(void)

/*
* PARAMETERIZED_TEST_FUNCTION - A macro for defining parameterized test functions
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattdurak mattdurak Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

open item: Should we have some MD for this? We don't have docs for c-testrunnerswitcher

mattdurak
mattdurak commented Jan 16, 2026
View reviewed changes
inc/testrunnerswitcher.h
#define PTRS_ARGS_DECL_MORE(t1, n1, ...) t1 n1 PTRS_ARGS_DECL_REST(__VA_ARGS__)
#define PTRS_ARGS_DECL_DISPATCH_0(...) PTRS_ARGS_DECL_MORE(__VA_ARGS__)
#define PTRS_ARGS_DECL_DISPATCH_1(...) PTRS_ARGS_DECL_2(__VA_ARGS__)
#define PTRS_ARGS_DECL(...) MU_C2(PTRS_ARGS_DECL_DISPATCH_, MU_ISEMPTY(MU_IF(MU_ISZERO(MU_DEC(MU_DEC(MU_COUNT_ARG(__VA_ARGS__)))), 1, )))(__VA_ARGS__)
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattdurak mattdurak Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a feeling this can be re-written with macro_utils, this is just what the bot came up with

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@anporumb anporumb Awaiting requested review from anporumb

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattdurak