Skip to content

Conversation

@5eeman
Copy link

@5eeman 5eeman commented Oct 28, 2025

No description provided.

@5eeman
Copy link
Author

5eeman commented Nov 18, 2025

@ahmednfwela can you review this PR, please?

@ahmednfwela
Copy link
Member

hi @5eeman sorry for the delay

is there a reason to lower the dependency constraints?

@5eeman
Copy link
Author

5eeman commented Nov 19, 2025

Hi!
No worries, all good!
The only change in crypto_keys_plus 0.5.0 is change of pointycastle dependency from 3.x.x to 4.0.0
So if we will lower this dependency constraint it will allow clients to use both 3.x.x and 4.0.0 versions of it.

Copy link
Member

@ahmednfwela ahmednfwela left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution, LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants