Skip to content

Conversation

@SeanMcOwen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Member

@danlessa danlessa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should make sure that the definitions at params.py does match with the AztecModelParams on types.py, as the latter is the source of truth of what are the system parameters. Also, this allows for type checking through mypy

safety_factor_commit_bond=0.0,
safety_factor_reveal_content=0.0,
safety_factor_rollup_proof=0.0,
past_gas_weight_fraction=0.9,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make sure to add the new parameters into the AztecModelParams definition at types.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants