Skip to content

Conversation

@rahatmoktadir03
Copy link

"This PR contains intentional code issues to test our multi-agent AI review system:

Test Files Added:

  • user-manager.js: Contains SQL injection vulnerabilities, performance issues, and poor error handling
  • password-manager.py: Uses weak cryptography (MD5), missing input validation, security issues
  • api-client.ts: Missing documentation, poor error handling, security logging concerns

Expected AI Agent Reviews:

  • 🔒 Security Agent: Should detect SQL injection, MD5 usage, sensitive data logging
  • Performance Agent: Should identify inefficient loops, unnecessary API calls
  • Code Quality Agent: Should flag naming conventions, error handling, code structure
  • 📝 Documentation Agent: Should suggest missing JSDoc, function documentation
  • 🧪 Testing Agent: Should recommend unit tests for all new functions

Let's see how our enhanced AI review system performs! 🚀

- user-manager.js: SQL injection, performance issues, poor error handling
- password-manager.py: Weak crypto, MD5 usage, missing validation
- api-client.ts: Missing docs, poor error handling, security logging
 Model Updates:
- Updated from deprecated mixtral-8x7b-32768 to llama-3.1-70b-versatile
- Fixed TypeScript compatibility issues in prompts.ts
- Maintained backwards compatibility for type checking

 Technical Changes:
- src/llms/groq.ts: Updated GROQ_MODEL export
- src/utils/config.ts: Updated primaryModel config
- src/prompts.ts: Added deprecated model to type record for compatibility

This fixes the 400 errors from Groq API and ensures all agents work properly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant