Skip to content

Conversation

@mariuskh
Copy link

I think the corrections should be OK, but please have a look before merging :)
Note: This is branched from the other pull request (for week1). So if this one is merged, the other one can be deleted.

"$$\n",
"\\hat{P}_{ij}\\Psi_{\\lambda}(x_1, x_2, \\dots,x_i,\\dots,x_j,\\dots,x_N)=\n",
"\\beta\\Psi_{\\lambda}(x_1, x_2, \\dots,x_i,\\dots,x_j,\\dots,x_N),\n",
"\\beta\\Psi_{\\lambda}(x_1, x_2, \\dots,x_j,\\dots,x_i,\\dots,x_N),\n",
Copy link
Author

@mariuskh mariuskh Feb 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realize now that this was probably correct the way it was. I will change it back.

"source": [
"$$\n",
"H_0\\vert 10 \\rangle = \\epsilon_{10}\\vert 10 \\rangle,\n",
"H_0\\vert 01 \\rangle = \\epsilon_{01}\\vert 01 \\rangle,\n",
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes are strictly speaking not necessary, but I guess it makes sense to change the ordering, because of the correction above in the definition of |01> and |10>.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant