This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2020. It is now read-only.
Clean up ghc-mod's Emacs frontend #672
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- `ghc-mod-mode` is now a minor mode providing ghc-mod's functionality - Backwards compatibility is provided by calling `(ghc-mod-mode)` from `ghc-init` and (eventually) warning users that used the `ghc-*-key` variables to change keybindings since now a minor-mode specific keymap is used. - I also intend to rename most non-user facing functions and varaibles to use the `ghc-mod-` prefix rather than `ghc-`
Presumably the no-longer existing ghc-save-buffer has been replaced by the defadvice
Mainly remove uses of ghc-* properties in ghc-check.
(current-buffer) refered to the ghc-mod process buffer not the (user) file buffer we actually wanted to check for modifications.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See previous discussion: #325