Skip to content

Comments

⚡ Bolt: Optimize LogsView rendering with React.memo#85

Draft
Dexploarer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/logs-view-optimization-15666202315655600775
Draft

⚡ Bolt: Optimize LogsView rendering with React.memo#85
Dexploarer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/logs-view-optimization-15666202315655600775

Conversation

@Dexploarer
Copy link
Owner

💡 What: Extracted LogEntryRow component and wrapped it in React.memo with a custom comparison function.
🎯 Why: To prevent unnecessary re-renders of log entries when the parent component updates, improving performance in the logs view.
📊 Impact: Reduces re-renders significantly during filtering and log updates.
🔬 Measurement: Verified with tsc to ensure type correctness. Full test suite could not be run due to environment issues, but the change is a standard React optimization pattern.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 15666202315655600775 started by @Dexploarer

Extracted log entries into a memoized `LogEntryRow` component to prevent re-renders of the entire list when unrelated state (e.g., search query, filters) changes.
Implemented a custom comparison function `areLogEntriesEqual` to handle deep equality checks for log entry objects, ensuring efficient updates even with new object references.

Impact:
- Reduces re-renders of log rows when filtering or receiving new logs.
- Improves responsiveness of the logs view, especially with large log volumes.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bolt/logs-view-optimization-15666202315655600775

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dexploarer, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the rendering performance of the LogsView component by implementing React memoization for individual log entries. By extracting the log entry into its own component and applying React.memo with a custom equality check, unnecessary re-renders are avoided, leading to a smoother user experience, especially during filtering and log updates. Additionally, a new file documents a recent environment setup challenge and its workaround.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: Extracted the individual log entry rendering into a dedicated LogEntryRow component.
  • Memoization: Wrapped the LogEntryRow component with React.memo and provided a custom comparison function (areLogEntriesEqual) to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
  • Environment Documentation: Added a new markdown file to document an environment verification issue and a recommended action for future development.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • .jules/bolt.md
    • Added a new markdown file to document a blocked environment verification due to a broken dependency path.
    • Included learning points and actions for verifying changes when the root workspace setup fails.
  • apps/app/src/components/LogsView.tsx
    • Imported memo from React to enable component memoization.
    • Defined areLogEntriesEqual, a custom comparison function for LogEntry props, checking timestamp, level, source, message, and tags.
    • Extracted the rendering logic for a single log entry into a new functional component, LogEntryRow.
    • Wrapped LogEntryRow with React.memo using areLogEntriesEqual to optimize re-rendering behavior.
    • Replaced the inline rendering of log entries within the LogsView component with the new LogEntryRow component.
Activity
  • The pull request was automatically created by Jules for task 15666202315655600775, initiated by @Dexploarer.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

filteredLogs.map((entry: LogEntry) => (
<div
<LogEntryRow
key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}`}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The key for each LogEntryRow is constructed as ${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}. This approach does not guarantee uniqueness if multiple log entries share the same values for these fields, which could lead to React key collisions and rendering inconsistencies.

Recommendation: If possible, use a unique identifier (such as a log entry ID) for the key. If such an ID is not available, consider including an array index as a fallback, or ensure that the combination of fields used is always unique.

Comment on lines +41 to +46

if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false;

for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) {
if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tag comparison in areLogEntriesEqual is order-sensitive: it returns false if the order of tags differs, even if the sets are otherwise identical. If the tags array is not guaranteed to be ordered, this could cause unnecessary re-renders or missed updates.

Recommendation: If tag order is not significant, compare tags as sets (e.g., by sorting before comparison or using a Set for equality check). If order is significant, document this assumption clearly.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively optimizes the LogsView component by extracting LogEntryRow and memoizing it with React.memo. This is a great performance improvement that will prevent unnecessary re-renders. The implementation is well done. I've pointed out a potential bug in the list key generation that could lead to issues with duplicate keys, and I've also suggested a small improvement for better code maintainability and typing.

filteredLogs.map((entry: LogEntry) => (
<div
<LogEntryRow
key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}`}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The current key generation might not be unique. If two log entries are identical except for their tags, they will end up with the same key, which can lead to rendering issues and warnings in React. To ensure uniqueness, the tags should also be included in the key.

              key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}-${(entry.tags ?? []).join(',')}`}

Comment on lines +21 to +52
function areLogEntriesEqual(
prevProps: { entry: LogEntry },
nextProps: { entry: LogEntry },
) {
const p = prevProps.entry;
const n = nextProps.entry;

if (p === n) return true;

if (
p.timestamp !== n.timestamp ||
p.level !== n.level ||
p.source !== n.source ||
p.message !== n.message
) {
return false;
}

const pTags = p.tags ?? [];
const nTags = n.tags ?? [];

if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false;

for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) {
if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false;
}

return true;
}

// Optimized row component to prevent re-renders when parent state changes (e.g. search filter)
const LogEntryRow = memo(function LogEntryRow({ entry }: { entry: LogEntry }) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better type safety and reusability, it's a good practice to define a Props type for the LogEntryRow component and use it in both the component definition and the areLogEntriesEqual comparison function.

type LogEntryRowProps = {
  entry: LogEntry;
};

function areLogEntriesEqual(
  prevProps: LogEntryRowProps,
  nextProps: LogEntryRowProps,
) {
  const p = prevProps.entry;
  const n = nextProps.entry;

  if (p === n) return true;

  if (
    p.timestamp !== n.timestamp ||
    p.level !== n.level ||
    p.source !== n.source ||
    p.message !== n.message
  ) {
    return false;
  }

  const pTags = p.tags ?? [];
  const nTags = n.tags ?? [];

  if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false;

  for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) {
    if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false;
  }

  return true;
}

// Optimized row component to prevent re-renders when parent state changes (e.g. search filter)
const LogEntryRow = memo(function LogEntryRow({ entry }: LogEntryRowProps) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant