⚡ Bolt: Optimize LogsView rendering with React.memo#85
⚡ Bolt: Optimize LogsView rendering with React.memo#85Dexploarer wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Extracted log entries into a memoized `LogEntryRow` component to prevent re-renders of the entire list when unrelated state (e.g., search query, filters) changes. Implemented a custom comparison function `areLogEntriesEqual` to handle deep equality checks for log entry objects, ensuring efficient updates even with new object references. Impact: - Reduces re-renders of log rows when filtering or receiving new logs. - Improves responsiveness of the logs view, especially with large log volumes.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @Dexploarer, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the rendering performance of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
| filteredLogs.map((entry: LogEntry) => ( | ||
| <div | ||
| <LogEntryRow | ||
| key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The key for each LogEntryRow is constructed as ${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}. This approach does not guarantee uniqueness if multiple log entries share the same values for these fields, which could lead to React key collisions and rendering inconsistencies.
Recommendation: If possible, use a unique identifier (such as a log entry ID) for the key. If such an ID is not available, consider including an array index as a fallback, or ensure that the combination of fields used is always unique.
|
|
||
| if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false; | ||
|
|
||
| for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) { | ||
| if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tag comparison in areLogEntriesEqual is order-sensitive: it returns false if the order of tags differs, even if the sets are otherwise identical. If the tags array is not guaranteed to be ordered, this could cause unnecessary re-renders or missed updates.
Recommendation: If tag order is not significant, compare tags as sets (e.g., by sorting before comparison or using a Set for equality check). If order is significant, document this assumption clearly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively optimizes the LogsView component by extracting LogEntryRow and memoizing it with React.memo. This is a great performance improvement that will prevent unnecessary re-renders. The implementation is well done. I've pointed out a potential bug in the list key generation that could lead to issues with duplicate keys, and I've also suggested a small improvement for better code maintainability and typing.
| filteredLogs.map((entry: LogEntry) => ( | ||
| <div | ||
| <LogEntryRow | ||
| key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current key generation might not be unique. If two log entries are identical except for their tags, they will end up with the same key, which can lead to rendering issues and warnings in React. To ensure uniqueness, the tags should also be included in the key.
key={`${entry.timestamp}-${entry.source}-${entry.level}-${entry.message}-${(entry.tags ?? []).join(',')}`}
| function areLogEntriesEqual( | ||
| prevProps: { entry: LogEntry }, | ||
| nextProps: { entry: LogEntry }, | ||
| ) { | ||
| const p = prevProps.entry; | ||
| const n = nextProps.entry; | ||
|
|
||
| if (p === n) return true; | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| p.timestamp !== n.timestamp || | ||
| p.level !== n.level || | ||
| p.source !== n.source || | ||
| p.message !== n.message | ||
| ) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const pTags = p.tags ?? []; | ||
| const nTags = n.tags ?? []; | ||
|
|
||
| if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false; | ||
|
|
||
| for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) { | ||
| if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Optimized row component to prevent re-renders when parent state changes (e.g. search filter) | ||
| const LogEntryRow = memo(function LogEntryRow({ entry }: { entry: LogEntry }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better type safety and reusability, it's a good practice to define a Props type for the LogEntryRow component and use it in both the component definition and the areLogEntriesEqual comparison function.
type LogEntryRowProps = {
entry: LogEntry;
};
function areLogEntriesEqual(
prevProps: LogEntryRowProps,
nextProps: LogEntryRowProps,
) {
const p = prevProps.entry;
const n = nextProps.entry;
if (p === n) return true;
if (
p.timestamp !== n.timestamp ||
p.level !== n.level ||
p.source !== n.source ||
p.message !== n.message
) {
return false;
}
const pTags = p.tags ?? [];
const nTags = n.tags ?? [];
if (pTags.length !== nTags.length) return false;
for (let i = 0; i < pTags.length; i++) {
if (pTags[i] !== nTags[i]) return false;
}
return true;
}
// Optimized row component to prevent re-renders when parent state changes (e.g. search filter)
const LogEntryRow = memo(function LogEntryRow({ entry }: LogEntryRowProps) {
💡 What: Extracted
LogEntryRowcomponent and wrapped it inReact.memowith a custom comparison function.🎯 Why: To prevent unnecessary re-renders of log entries when the parent component updates, improving performance in the logs view.
📊 Impact: Reduces re-renders significantly during filtering and log updates.
🔬 Measurement: Verified with
tscto ensure type correctness. Full test suite could not be run due to environment issues, but the change is a standard React optimization pattern.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15666202315655600775 started by @Dexploarer