Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 0 additions & 10 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ Diora [documentation](https://diora.network/docs).

## Requirements

- python
- virtualenv

## Contribute

Expand All @@ -18,16 +16,8 @@ git clone https://github.com/diora-network/docs.git

Create a virtualenv for this project.

```bash
cd docs
virtualenv .env
```

Activate your virtualenv.

```bash
source .env/bin/activate
```

Install the required libraries in your project's virtualenv.

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/dapp/gas.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Gas Rebates

Unlike existing smart contract platforms, Diora does not burn gas fees or distribute them entirely to the validators or miners. Instead, the collected gas fees are split between dApp developers, masternodes and our on-chain tresuary.
Unlike existing smart contract platforms, Diora does not burn gas fees or distribute them entirely to the validators or miners. Instead, the collected gas fees are split between dApp developers, masternodes and our on-chain Treasury.

At network launch, gas fees are divided as follows.

Expand All @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ At network launch, gas fees are divided as follows.

- 30% of all gas fees go to treasury split 50/50 with DioraDAO & on-chain treasury

From the developer perspective, a contract receives a 50% rebate on all gas paid. From the masternode perspective, deferring a portion of rewards in the near term effectively drives transaction volumes, fees, and increases the value of the underlying network in the future.
From the developer perspective, a contract receives a 50% rebate on all gas paid. From the Masternode perspective, deferring a portion of rewards in the near term effectively drives transaction volumes, fees, and increases the value of the underlying network in the future.

It would not be profitable for an attacker to spam transactions on the network as gas rebates recoup only part of the fees paid (50%). As an additional safeguard against potential abuse and to prevent the deployment of spam contracts, gas fees are higher for uploading new contracts than for routine transactions. Gas fees are still sufficiently low to allow smaller projects to upload contracts.

Expand Down