-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
"renamed-to-bad-request" #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe error handling in several asynchronous methods across the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/databaseQueries/entities.js(6 hunks)src/databaseQueries/entityTypes.js(3 hunks)src/databaseQueries/userRoleExtension.js(4 hunks)
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | ||
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Systematic misclassification of database errors across all methods.
All six database operation methods have been changed to return bad_request (400) instead of internal_server_error (500) for unclassified errors. This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of HTTP status codes:
- 400 Bad Request: Client sent invalid/malformed data
- 500 Internal Server Error: Server-side failure (database issues, unexpected errors)
Database operation failures (connection issues, constraint violations, etc.) are server-side problems and should maintain 500 status codes.
Recommendation: Revert these changes and implement proper error classification:
} catch (error) {
// Handle specific database errors
if (error.name === 'ValidationError') {
return reject({
status: HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status,
message: error.message,
errorObject: error,
})
}
// Default to server error for unclassified issues
return reject({
status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status,
message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.message,
errorObject: error,
})
}Also applies to: 43-44, 67-68, 93-94, 147-148, 207-208
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/databaseQueries/entities.js at lines 18-19 and similarly at lines 43-44,
67-68, 93-94, 147-148, and 207-208, the error handling incorrectly returns HTTP
400 Bad Request for all database errors. Update the catch blocks to classify
errors properly by returning HTTP 400 only for validation errors (e.g.,
error.name === 'ValidationError') and default to HTTP 500 Internal Server Error
for all other unclassified database errors. Ensure the reject calls include the
correct status, message, and errorObject accordingly.
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | ||
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reconsider changing database error status from 500 to 400.
Database creation failures are typically server-side issues (connection problems, constraint violations, etc.) rather than client input problems. Using bad_request (400) as the default status may mislead API consumers about the nature of the error.
Consider implementing more specific error handling:
} catch (error) {
- return reject({
- status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status,
- message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message,
- errorObject: error,
- })
+ return reject({
+ status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status,
+ message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.message,
+ errorObject: error,
+ })
}Or implement more granular error classification based on error types.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | |
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return reject({ | |
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status, | |
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.message, | |
| errorObject: error, | |
| }) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/databaseQueries/entityTypes.js at lines 77-78, the default error status
for database creation failures is set to 400 (bad_request), which is misleading
since these are usually server-side errors. Change the default status to 500
(internal_server_error) instead of 400, and consider adding more specific error
handling to classify errors based on their types for more accurate status codes.
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | ||
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Database query failures should return 500, not 400.
Similar to the create method, database query failures are typically server-side issues. A 400 status code suggests the client made an invalid request, which is misleading for database operation failures.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/databaseQueries/entityTypes.js around lines 131 to 132, the error
handling for database query failures currently returns a 400 status code, which
incorrectly implies a client error. Update the status code to 500 to correctly
indicate a server-side error. Replace HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status with
HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status and similarly update the message
to HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.message to reflect this change.
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | ||
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update operation failures should return 500, not 400.
Database update failures are server-side issues and should maintain the 500 status code to properly communicate the nature of the error to API consumers.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/databaseQueries/entityTypes.js around lines 161 to 162, the error
handling for update operation failures currently returns a 400 status code,
which is incorrect for server-side errors. Change the default status code from
HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status (400) to
HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status (500) to correctly indicate a
server error when the error status is not provided.
| status: error.status || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.status, | ||
| message: error.message || HTTP_STATUS_CODE.bad_request.message, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Database operation errors should use 500 status code, not 400.
All database operation failures in this class have been changed to return bad_request (400) status. This is inappropriate because database failures are typically server-side issues, not client input problems. This change could confuse API consumers about error categorization.
The affected methods (create, findOneAndUpdate, userDocuments, findOneAndDelete) should revert to using internal_server_error status for unclassified database errors.
Also applies to: 47-48, 103-104, 124-125
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/databaseQueries/userRoleExtension.js at lines 21-22, 47-48, 103-104, and
124-125, the error handling for database operation failures incorrectly uses the
400 bad_request status code. These should be changed to use the 500
internal_server_error status code instead, as database errors are server-side
issues. Update the error.status and error.message fallback values to
HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.status and
HTTP_STATUS_CODE.internal_server_error.message respectively in all these
locations.
Summary by CodeRabbit