Skip to content

Conversation

@myronahn
Copy link
Contributor

@myronahn myronahn commented Nov 1, 2013

Squashed all the commits into one - in another branch

Ready for review.

Myron Ahn added 2 commits November 1, 2013 19:36
Squashed all the commits into one - in another branch
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess we should standardize on what we're calling this. is it "temp targets" or "checkpointing"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point - "temp targets" sounds good to me.

Myron Ahn added 2 commits November 14, 2013 12:53
#106
Standardize on name "temp targets"
Use -> for cleaner code
Add comments for ramifications of error when deleting temp target
Also: made sure temp target testing is in the regtest suite
@myronahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Checked in code review fixes - all tests pass.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(def no-data-in? (complement data-in?))
?

@aboytsov
Copy link
Contributor

The code LGTM. But I think we should update the doc (pre-emptively) before releasing - I would love to see how this feature looks like from the end user's perspective. Ideally the documentation is easy to understand and covers edge cases as well. :)

myronahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2014
#106
Standardize on name "temp targets"
Use -> for cleaner code
Add comments for ramifications of error when deleting temp target
Also: made sure temp target testing is in the regtest suite

Conflicts:
	resources/regtest/run-all.sh
	src/drake/core.clj
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants