Conversation
This allows for diagnosing problems more easily.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I am currently investigating the stack usage of our FreeRTOS application on a Cortex-M7 platform with the help of puncover. I found some minor details to improve upon for my use case and this is the current state. The focus is on providing an easy way to use puncover in automation. There is certainly a better way to do that but the low-hanging fruit was to simply make it easier to interact with puncover with command-line tools. With those changes I am able to trigger puncover and analyzing its results via cmake targets. The
--new-windowpatch does not do what I'd expect on my system but AFAICT that's not an issue of the code but the underlying libs or my browser.There might come more patches in the future and everything is up to debate if need be...