Implement comprehensive data validation and error handling for backend#3
Open
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
Open
Implement comprehensive data validation and error handling for backend#3devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
- Add validation.py module with centralized validation functions for user data, invoice data, and invoice items - Add error_handlers.py module with custom exception classes and standardized error response functions - Add comprehensive test suite in test_validation.py following existing unittest patterns - Update auth.py routes to use centralized validation functions - Update invoices.py routes to use centralized validation functions - All 38 tests pass including 31 new validation tests - Maintains backward compatibility while improving validation consistency Co-Authored-By: jia.wu@codeium.com <jia_wu@hotmail.ca>
Author
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
⚙️ Control Options:
|
Owner
|
Devin can you re-run the test suite? There are dependencies that might have changed as a result of other engineers work |
Author
|
✅ Test Suite Re-run Complete I've successfully merged the latest master changes (including updates to requirements.txt, models.py, and other files from other engineers) and re-run the complete test suite as requested. Test Results:
Test Methods Verified:
The validation and error handling implementation remains fully functional despite the dependency changes. No regressions were introduced by the merge with master. The PR is ready for review and merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement comprehensive data validation and error handling for backend
Summary
This PR implements centralized data validation and error handling for the Invoice Application backend, replacing scattered inline validation with reusable, well-tested validation functions. The changes include:
validation.pymodule with functions for validating user data, invoice data, and invoice itemserror_handlers.pymodule with custom exception classes and standardized error response functionstest_validation.py) with 31 tests covering all validation scenariosThe implementation follows the existing codebase patterns and maintains the same error response formats while providing better code organization and test coverage.
Review & Testing Checklist for Human
Recommended Test Plan:
/api/auth/register,/api/auth/login, and/api/invoicesendpoints with both valid and invalid data{"error": "specific error message"}Diagram
%%{ init : { "theme" : "default" }}%% flowchart TD subgraph "New Validation Layer" validation["validation.py<br/>(validation functions)"]:::major-edit errorhandlers["error_handlers.py<br/>(custom exceptions)"]:::major-edit testvalidation["test_validation.py<br/>(31 tests)"]:::major-edit end subgraph "Updated Routes" authroutes["routes/auth.py<br/>(register, login)"]:::minor-edit invoiceroutes["routes/invoices.py<br/>(CRUD operations)"]:::minor-edit end subgraph "Existing Infrastructure" models["models.py<br/>(User, Invoice, InvoiceItem)"]:::context testjwt["test_jwt.py<br/>(existing tests)"]:::context end authroutes -->|"uses validate_user_data()"| validation invoiceroutes -->|"uses validate_invoice_data()"| validation authroutes -->|"uses create_error_response()"| errorhandlers invoiceroutes -->|"uses create_error_response()"| errorhandlers testvalidation -->|"tests"| validation testvalidation -->|"tests"| errorhandlers validation -->|"validates against"| models subgraph Legend L1[Major Edit]:::major-edit L2[Minor Edit]:::minor-edit L3[Context/No Edit]:::context end classDef major-edit fill:#90EE90 classDef minor-edit fill:#87CEEB classDef context fill:#FFFFFFNotes
Nonefor success or error message string for failure, following a consistent patternjsonify({'error': '...'})response format for backward compatibilityLink to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/a690b473609e4cd99a7a21f859539c78
Requested by: @JRWu