Closed
Conversation
Member
|
Do we need another codespeed instance for this? https://speed.juliagpu.org/ is only for CUDA.jl right now. I wonder if there isn't a better solution nowadays; other projects seem to be tackling this slightly differently:
|
a8ddb34 to
dadbf35
Compare
[only benchmarks] [skip docs]
Member
Author
|
I think the GemmKernels.jl solution would be the best fit since these cannot be run with Github Actions. I'll finish this up when I get more time. |
088d5ee to
a5b02cf
Compare
Member
The LuxDL.jl approach also runs on Buildkite: JuliaGPU/KernelAbstractions.jl#510 (comment) |
e087748 to
5251b6c
Compare
Member
Author
|
Moved over to #420 with a JuliaGPU branch in an attempt to figure out why it stopped working. Will continue development on that branch. Sorry for the noise. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Copying over the benchmarks from CUDA.jl.
I'm not sure if I converted them properly. Some function seem to be missing Metal implementations (like
reverse).The final (and biggest) problem is how inconsistent these results have been. Simply rerunning the benchmarks on the same code gives some huge performance differences. There is always at least one benchmark that is >20% slower or faster.
See #418 (comment)
Todo: