Skip to content

Conversation

@nayrukii
Copy link

@nayrukii nayrukii commented Aug 1, 2025

Description

This PR adds configuration updates to improve repository quality and security:

  • Adds a CODEOWNERS file assigning @Thaleszh as the maintainer.
  • Adds a stale-pr.yml workflow to automatically mark and close stale issues and pull requests.
  • Adds a codeql.yml workflow to enable automated code scanning for security vulnerabilities.

These changes are part of the repository hardening efforts to ensure proper review assignment, automated cleanup of old contributions, and vulnerability detection.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • chore (Updates on dependencies, gitignore, etc)

How Has This Been Tested?

These are configuration-level changes and do not affect runtime code directly.

  • Verified the syntax of CODEOWNERS.
  • Reused the stale-pr.yml and codeql.yml workflows from the working setup in kiijs-sdk.
  • Confirmed both workflows follow GitHub Actions documentation.

No unit or integration tests are required for this PR.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Walkthrough

Three new configuration files have been added to the repository. A CODEOWNERS file designates @Thaleszh as the owner for all files. Two GitHub Actions workflows are introduced: one for CodeQL analysis, which runs on pushes and pull requests to the main branch, and another for managing stale pull requests, scheduled to run daily and also triggerable manually. The stale PR workflow uses the actions/stale@v9 action with a configuration that sets days-before-issue-stale to -1.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/stale-pr

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

1-1: Single-owner rule looks good but consider redundancy.

Relying on a single CODEOWNER means all reviews block on @Thaleszh’s availability. Adding a backup owner (team or second maintainer) prevents PR bottlenecks when the primary reviewer is unavailable.

.github/workflows/codeql.yml (2)

1-8: Trigger only on main may miss security findings for release branches.

If you later introduce long-lived branches (e.g. release/* or develop) they will not receive CodeQL scans. Consider broadening the branch filter or using push: { branches-ignore: [...] }.


9-15: Tighten default permissions.

Granting security-events: write is required, but packages: read is only needed when using private CodeQL packs. If you aren’t using them, drop this permission to follow the principle of least privilege.

.github/workflows/stale-pr.yml (1)

11-14: Explicitly configure PR stale/close windows for clarity.

You disable issue-stale handling via days-before-issue-stale: -1, but PR timings fall back to the action’s defaults (30 days stale, 7 days to close). If different values are desired, add:

       - uses: actions/stale@v9
         with:
           days-before-issue-stale: -1
+          days-before-pr-stale: 45
+          days-before-pr-close: 10

This makes behaviour explicit and documents intent.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bda4fd4 and ad38436.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/stale-pr.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml

22-22: the runner of "github/codeql-action/init@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


24-24: the runner of "github/codeql-action/analyze@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Code coverage
  • GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/stale-pr.yml (1)

3-6: Cron schedule uses UTC 01:30 — confirm aligns with maintainer hours.

Nothing wrong here, just ensure notifications/resolutions happen within your team’s working window.

@nayrukii nayrukii changed the title chore: add CODEOWNERS, stale and codeql PR workflow Codeowner, stale-pr and codeql Aug 1, 2025
@Thaleszh Thaleszh merged commit 5d4af8c into main Aug 4, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants