Skip to content

Conversation

@stayaway245
Copy link

No description provided.

@stayaway245 stayaway245 merged commit 0ed18ba into main Apr 14, 2025
1 check failed
@mentatbot
Copy link

mentatbot bot commented Apr 14, 2025

I'm getting to work. See my steps and track my cost here.

  • Wake on any new activity.
    I always see new activity while actively working. When paused, I'll only respond when tagged unless this box is checked.

Copy link

@mentatbot mentatbot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've reviewed the changes in this PR which simplifies the iOS build configuration in the GitHub Actions workflow.

Changes overview

  • Removed the complex approach of dynamically creating a CMake toolchain file (cmake/ios-toolchain.cmake)
  • Replaced with direct CMake command-line arguments for the iOS build
  • Simplified handling of compiler and linker flags

Analysis

This change appears to be beneficial for several reasons:

  1. Reduced complexity: The new approach is more straightforward and easier to understand
  2. Avoided quoting issues: Directly specifying CMake arguments eliminates the shell quoting/escaping issues that can happen when generating files with embedded quotes
  3. Better maintainability: The direct approach makes the build process more transparent

Note

I noticed there's duplicate code for checking for Dobby in the build script - it's setting the Dobby flags in EXTRA_CMAKE_ARGS twice:

  • Once before the "simpler approach" comment
  • Again right after it

This duplication doesn't cause issues in the current code but could potentially lead to confusion in future maintenance. Consider removing one of these duplicate sections in a future PR.

The build now correctly passes the iOS architecture, deployment target, and feature flags directly to CMake, which is a cleaner approach than using a toolchain file for this purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants