Skip to content

Added Jenkinsfile & also jenkins output images stepwise#4

Open
shailesh271997 wants to merge 1 commit intoLondheShubham153:DevOpsfrom
shailesh271997:Jenkinsfile
Open

Added Jenkinsfile & also jenkins output images stepwise#4
shailesh271997 wants to merge 1 commit intoLondheShubham153:DevOpsfrom
shailesh271997:Jenkinsfile

Conversation

@shailesh271997
Copy link

@shailesh271997 shailesh271997 commented Nov 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a Jenkins pipeline to automate code cloning, building, pushing to Docker Hub, and deploying the application.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced deployment process with automated Docker container management.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

A new Jenkins pipeline has been introduced in the Jenkinsfile. This pipeline operates on an agent labeled 'spring-server' and includes four stages: Code Clone, Code Build & Test, Push To DockerHub, and Deploy. Each stage is designed to automate specific tasks such as cloning the repository, building a Docker image, pushing the image to Docker Hub, and deploying the application using Docker Compose.

Changes

File Change Summary
Jenkinsfile Added a new pipeline with four stages: Code Clone, Code Build & Test, Push To DockerHub, and Deploy.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Jenkins
    participant Git
    participant Docker
    participant DockerHub
    participant Compose

    Jenkins->>Git: Clone repository (nginx-setup)
    Jenkins->>Docker: Build Docker image (springboot-bankapp)
    Jenkins->>DockerHub: Log in and push image
    Jenkins->>Compose: Stop running containers
    Jenkins->>Compose: Start new containers with --build
Loading

🐇 "In the pipeline, we hop and play,
Cloning code, building all day.
To Docker Hub, our images fly,
Deploying swiftly, oh my, oh my!
With each stage, our work's a delight,
Hopping forward, everything's right!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Jenkinsfile (1)

34-36: Add post-build actions and notifications.

Consider adding a post section to handle cleanup and notifications:

     stages {
         // ... existing stages ...
     }
+    post {
+        always {
+            cleanWs()
+            sh 'docker system prune -f'
+        }
+        success {
+            slackSend(color: 'good', message: "Build succeeded: ${env.JOB_NAME} #${env.BUILD_NUMBER}")
+        }
+        failure {
+            slackSend(color: 'danger', message: "Build failed: ${env.JOB_NAME} #${env.BUILD_NUMBER}")
+        }
+    }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d16279d and 3ba0e88.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-1.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-2.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-3.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-4.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-5.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • jenkins-steps-images/step-6.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Jenkinsfile (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +5 to +10
stage("Code Clone") {
steps {
echo "Code Clone Stage"
git url: "https://github.com/shailesh271997/Springboot-BankApp.git", branch: "nginx-setup"
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve Git checkout configuration.

Several improvements are recommended for the Code Clone stage:

  1. Use checkout scm instead of explicit git step for Pipeline projects
  2. Clean workspace before checkout
  3. Use parameters for branch selection instead of hard-coding
-        stage("Code Clone") {
+        stage("Checkout") {
             steps {
-                echo "Code Clone Stage"
-                git url: "https://github.com/shailesh271997/Springboot-BankApp.git", branch: "nginx-setup"
+                cleanWs()
+                checkout scm
             }
         }

If you need to keep the explicit git step, consider using parameters:

parameters {
    string(name: 'BRANCH_NAME', defaultValue: 'nginx-setup', description: 'Git branch to build')
}

Comment on lines +1 to +3
pipeline {
agent { label 'spring-server' }

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add timeout and resource constraints to the pipeline.

Consider adding pipeline-level timeout and resource constraints to prevent hung builds and resource exhaustion:

 pipeline {
     agent { label 'spring-server' }
+    options {
+        timeout(time: 1, unit: 'HOURS')
+    }
+    resources {
+        memory '2048Mi'
+        cpu '500m'
+    }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +29 to +33
stage("Deploy") {
steps {
sh "docker compose down && docker compose up -d --build"
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve deployment reliability and add health checks.

The current deployment strategy has several concerns:

  1. No health checks after deployment
  2. No rollback strategy
  3. Potential downtime during deployment
  4. No verification of docker-compose.yml
         stage("Deploy") {
             steps {
-                sh "docker compose down && docker compose up -d --build"
+                script {
+                    try {
+                        // Verify docker-compose.yml exists
+                        sh '[ -f docker-compose.yml ] || (echo "docker-compose.yml not found" && exit 1)'
+                        
+                        // Rolling update to avoid downtime
+                        sh '''
+                            docker compose pull
+                            docker compose up -d --no-deps --build app
+                            
+                            # Wait for health check
+                            timeout 60s bash -c 'until curl -s http://localhost:8080/actuator/health | grep -q "UP"; do sleep 5; done'
+                        '''
+                    } catch (Exception e) {
+                        echo "Deployment failed, rolling back..."
+                        sh 'docker compose rollback app'
+                        error "Failed to deploy: ${e.message}"
+                    }
+                }
             }
         }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +11 to +16
stage("Code Build & Test") {
steps {
echo "Code Build Stage"
sh "docker build -t springboot-bankapp ."
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance build stage with tests and proper versioning.

The current build stage has several missing components:

  1. No actual tests are being run despite the stage name
  2. No version tagging strategy
  3. No build caching optimization
         stage("Code Build & Test") {
             steps {
-                echo "Code Build Stage"
-                sh "docker build -t springboot-bankapp ."
+                script {
+                    def version = env.BUILD_NUMBER
+                    // Run tests
+                    sh "./mvnw clean test"
+                    // Build with proper tags and cache
+                    sh """
+                        docker build \
+                            --cache-from springboot-bankapp:latest \
+                            -t springboot-bankapp:${version} \
+                            -t springboot-bankapp:latest \
+                            --build-arg VERSION=${version} \
+                            .
+                    """
+                }
             }
         }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
stage("Code Build & Test") {
steps {
echo "Code Build Stage"
sh "docker build -t springboot-bankapp ."
}
}
stage("Code Build & Test") {
steps {
script {
def version = env.BUILD_NUMBER
// Run tests
sh "./mvnw clean test"
// Build with proper tags and cache
sh """
docker build \
--cache-from springboot-bankapp:latest \
-t springboot-bankapp:${version} \
-t springboot-bankapp:latest \
--build-arg VERSION=${version} \
.
"""
}
}
}

Comment on lines +17 to +28
stage("Push To DockerHub") {
steps {
withCredentials([usernamePassword(
credentialsId: "dockerHubCreds",
usernameVariable: "dockerHubUser",
passwordVariable: "dockerHubPass")]) {
sh 'echo $dockerHubPass | docker login -u $dockerHubUser --password-stdin'
sh "docker image tag springboot-bankapp ${env.dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest"
sh "docker push ${env.dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest"
}
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add security scanning and error handling to Docker push stage.

The current stage needs security and reliability improvements:

  1. Add vulnerability scanning before pushing
  2. Add error handling
  3. Clean up local images after push
  4. Use specific registry URL instead of default Docker Hub
         stage("Push To DockerHub") {
             steps {
-                withCredentials([usernamePassword(
-                    credentialsId: "dockerHubCreds", 
-                    usernameVariable: "dockerHubUser", 
-                    passwordVariable: "dockerHubPass")]) {
-                    sh 'echo $dockerHubPass | docker login -u $dockerHubUser --password-stdin'
-                    sh "docker image tag springboot-bankapp ${env.dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest"
-                    sh "docker push ${env.dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest"
+                script {
+                    def version = env.BUILD_NUMBER
+                    try {
+                        // Scan for vulnerabilities
+                        sh "trivy image springboot-bankapp:${version}"
+                        
+                        withCredentials([usernamePassword(
+                            credentialsId: "dockerHubCreds", 
+                            usernameVariable: "dockerHubUser", 
+                            passwordVariable: "dockerHubPass")]) {
+                            sh '''
+                                echo $dockerHubPass | docker login -u $dockerHubUser --password-stdin docker.io
+                                docker image tag springboot-bankapp:${version} docker.io/${dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:${version}
+                                docker image tag springboot-bankapp:${version} docker.io/${dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest
+                                docker push docker.io/${dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:${version}
+                                docker push docker.io/${dockerHubUser}/springboot-bankapp:latest
+                            '''
+                        }
+                    } catch (Exception e) {
+                        error "Failed to push image: ${e.message}"
+                    } finally {
+                        sh 'docker logout'
+                        // Clean up local images
+                        sh "docker rmi springboot-bankapp:${version} || true"
+                    }
                 }
             }
         }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant