Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7eb3bf1744
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "legacy": { | ||
| "address": "0x0178B6baD606aaF908f72135B8eC32Fc1D5bA477", | ||
| "abiSource": "etherscan-html-fallback", | ||
| "txSource": "etherscan-html-scrape+rpc-unsafe", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This checked-in snapshot is marked as etherscan-html-scrape+rpc-unsafe, which the runbook itself describes as potentially missing historical internal admin calls; using it as the canonical input for 2_deploy_agijobmanager_from_legacy_snapshot.js can therefore replay an incomplete runtime state on mainnet (e.g., moderators/blacklists/base URI toggles inferred from mutator history). Before this migration is used operationally, the snapshot should be regenerated from the deterministic Etherscan API path (txlistinternal) and committed with a non-unsafe txSource.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| const snapshot = loadSnapshot(); | ||
| const chainId = Number(await web3.eth.getChainId()); | ||
| const intendedChainId = Number(snapshot.snapshot.chainId); | ||
| if (chainId !== intendedChainId && chainId !== 1337 && chainId !== 31337) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The chain-id guard explicitly allows 1337/31337 regardless of the snapshot chain, so this migration will run on a non-forked local chain and still pass its current assertions even though mainnet dependencies at agiToken/ens/nameWrapper are not actually present there. In practice this can produce false-positive dry-runs ("all assertions passed") that do not reflect real replay behavior, so the local bypass should verify forked state (for example by checking code/expected storage at known mainnet addresses).
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.
Codex Task