Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 87a09de951
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| const generatedAtUtc = (() => { | ||
| for (const rel of sourceFiles) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const stamp = execFileSync('git', ['log', '-1', '--format=%cI', '--', rel], { cwd: root, encoding: 'utf8' }).trim(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
generatedAtUtc is derived from git log -1 --format=%cI -- <path>, so the generated markdown changes based on how much Git history is available rather than on source content. Because scripts/docs/check-ens-docs.mjs does a byte-for-byte comparison against the committed docs/REFERENCE/ENS_REFERENCE.md, shallow or partial clones can report the file as stale even when no ENS source files changed, creating environment-specific false failures in npm run docs:ens:check.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.
Codex Task