Use rpmrebuild instead of fpm to rebuild rpm packages #1612
+103
−30
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21361838527Details
💛 - Coveralls |
elezar
force-pushed
the
use-rpm-rebuild-for-shas
branch
7 times, most recently
from
6db826a to
3632433
Compare
Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <elezar@nvidia.com>
elezar
force-pushed
the
use-rpm-rebuild-for-shas
branch
from
3632433 to
eb84439
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was found that using
fpmto regenerate the packages with SHA256 digests injects non-emptypretransscriptlets (see #1550). This change switches to usingrpmrebuildoverfpmto ensure that the packages have the correct digests in oder to address this.