Ar migrate storage builds drafts

[alexrichey]

Re-implements the Connectors for builds, drafts, published and gis, but doesn't swap them out just yet. You can read commit-by-commit for localized/grouped changes (e.g. just changes to builds functionality) as well as explanations for the smaller changes in the commit messages. (There's some 🌶️ content in the commit bodies)

Anyhow, the logic in published.py is basically distributed into files in a few different locations:

• connectors/edm/{conn_type}.py: The pure connector interfaces for the types above
• dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/{conn_type}.py: the business logic, including which connector to use, which files to upload, etc.
• dcpy/lifecycle/builds/_cli.py: all the CLI commands

There will be some continuing commits where we implement this:

• Swapping out the commands (PR here)
• TODO: delete publishing.

@fvankrieken @damonmcc Here's where I could use some input:
Consider a command like publishing a draft. This command needs to

1. pull the draft (after determining some details about the draft itself)
2. push the draft to published

Ideally this code would live in a module a little bit "above" artifacts/drafts and artifacts/published, almost similar to how lifecycle/scripts lives "above" the various lifecycle stages.

So I'd love it if you could take a look at the files under dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/*, and consider these "glue" functions like promote and publish. In the CLI they fit really nicely under namespaced commands like
dcpy lc builds artifacts drafts publish -p nypl_libraries -v 24v1 -dn 2 -ip
which make sense, because we publishing is an action that we take on a draft. However, where this glue code should live... I could use some input.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.88215% with 93 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 74.40%. Comparing base (6e5d0a3) to head (8258bb3).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/published.py	82.07%	13 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/_cli.py	0.00%	17 Missing ⚠️
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/drafts.py	75.40%	9 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
dcpy/connectors/edm/gis.py	82.66%	7 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
dcpy/connectors/edm/builds.py	85.52%	7 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/builds.py	89.55%	3 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
dcpy/connectors/edm/drafts.py	94.31%	4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
dcpy/connectors/edm/published.py	95.83%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/_cli.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
dcpy/configuration.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dcpy/connectors/hybrid_pathed_storage.py	86.95% <ø> (+2.90%)	⬆️
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/connector.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dcpy/lifecycle/config.py	67.74% <ø> (ø)
dcpy/lifecycle/connector_registry.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dcpy/connectors/edm/published.py	95.83% <95.83%> (ø)
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/_cli.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dcpy/connectors/edm/drafts.py	94.31% <94.31%> (ø)
dcpy/lifecycle/builds/artifacts/builds.py	89.55% <89.55%> (ø)
dcpy/connectors/edm/builds.py	85.52% <85.52%> (ø)
... and 4 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.