Skip to content

Conversation

@rnhmjoj
Copy link
Contributor

@rnhmjoj rnhmjoj commented Dec 10, 2025

Things done

The package has finally been fixed upstream but the release is not on Hackage yet.

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@rnhmjoj rnhmjoj changed the title haskellPackages.selda-json: unbreak haskellPackages.selda: unbreak Dec 10, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 6.topic: haskell General-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language labels Dec 10, 2025
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Asked for a hackage release in valderman/selda#203, let's see what they say.

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Dec 11, 2025

Asked for a hackage release in valderman/selda#203, let's see what they say.

Hi,

actually I'm helping with maintenance now (quite new development). Feel free to open MRs or issues in case you detect any other version breakage, simple patches should be mergeable and releasable very quickly now. (Except for this week because I'm traveling 😅 )

Anyway, thanks for the heads-up there!

@sternenseemann
Copy link
Member

I think this is okay to do even if we get a release given that the h-u lag is considerable nowadays…

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 8, 2026

Hi all, just fyi -- we just got everything into place and the release is out on hackage. Sorry for the delay, there was some logistics involved. Also, I had to move the 0.5.2.1 tag in the repo-- please bump your git if you used the tag for anything (there's only metadata changes, no functional difference should be detectable).

Given the amount of compat version bumps and the gap between releases, please do let us know in case you detect any further compat issues. :)

@rnhmjoj rnhmjoj changed the title haskellPackages.selda: unbreak haskellPackages.selda: remove obsolete override Jan 8, 2026
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

(will need to bump hackage on haskell-updates before merge, but I plan to do that on the weekend latest)

The package has been finally fixed upstream.
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther changed the title haskellPackages.selda: remove obsolete override haskellPackages.selda{,-json,-sqlite}: unbreak Jan 10, 2026
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Had to unbreak the packages as well. Did that, all 3 build now for me.

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 10, 2026

Had to unbreak the packages as well. Did that, all 3 build now for me.

Hi just to be sure, "unbreak" means removing broken status from nix and the current hackage versions are actually OKish, right? (As in, I hope it's not the case that the hackage ones are borked now)

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2026
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. and removed 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Jan 10, 2026
@rnhmjoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

rnhmjoj commented Jan 10, 2026

Thank you

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Hi just to be sure, "unbreak" means removing broken status from nix and the current hackage versions are actually OKish, right? (As in, I hope it's not the case that the hackage ones are borked now)

Yes, correct, they were still marked broken on the Nixpkgs-side. All looks good on hackage.

Merged via the queue into NixOS:haskell-updates with commit 471f44f Jan 10, 2026
29 of 33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: haskell General-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants