Skip to content

Conversation

@kksharma1618
Copy link

Fixes issue #8

@kksharma1618
Copy link
Author

Ran unit test after the fix. Worked.

screenshot 2015-06-19 12 13 40

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be we need to swap order here? Now we can get finishChunk event for chunk N after startChunk for N+1

@kksharma1618
Copy link
Author

:) sorry i missed that part. what do you think now?

@Olegas
Copy link
Owner

Olegas commented Jun 19, 2015

Now it is totally broken... Deeper refactoring is required here. We need to split _startIfNeededAndPushData into push and start in a case remainder is 0.
I think I can land your first commit in a separate branch and then refactor it further

@kksharma1618
Copy link
Author

Ok. Thanks for looking into it. Nice lib btw.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants