-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
Make it easier to run meta-analysis standalone #3728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ashiklom
wants to merge
15
commits into
PecanProject:develop
Choose a base branch
from
ashiklom:feature/standalone-meta-analysis
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Make it easier to run meta-analysis standalone #3728
ashiklom
wants to merge
15
commits into
PecanProject:develop
from
ashiklom:feature/standalone-meta-analysis
+508
−129
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mdietze
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2025
Member
Author
|
I introduced at least one bug in here, caught by the CI. So hold off on merging this. I'll get that fixed and make sure the tests pass. |
infotroph
reviewed
Dec 25, 2025
ashiklom
added a commit
to ashiklom/pecan
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2025
...without the file or database logic, but with some of the meta-analysis conveniences like pre-processing data, checking priors/posteriors, and calculating summary statistics. Takes inputs as lists; returns outputs as lists. Keeps file IO to a minimum (except as performed by functions this calls). See discussion in PecanProject#3718.
It's only ever used in `PEcAn.MA::jagify`. Moving it here is a step towards making `PEcAn.DB` at most a "Suggests" of `PEcAn.MA`.
...and other fixes from: PecanProject#3718 (comment)
5053f3b to
4316360
Compare
We should really use `saveRDS` / `readRDS`!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The
PEcAn.MA::run.meta.analysis.pftfunction has a lot of file I/O and some database interactions that make it difficult to run without the full PEcAn infrastructure. At the same time,PEcAn.MA::pecan.mais missing some useful pre- and post- checking and data processing. This introduces an intermediate function ---meta_analysis_standalone--- that includes the logic ofrun.meta.analysis.pftbut without the extra I/O and database interactions.run.meta.analysis.pfthas been refactored to be a thin wrapper aroundmeta_analysis_standalonealong with some file I/O. A minor breaking change is that all file writing now happens aftermeta_analysis_standaloneruns (e.g., before,jagged.datawas written to disk right after being created but before the meta-analysis was executed; now it's saved after the entire meta-analysis runs).I also added a short new vignette that shows how this function can be used. The Quarto notebook in #3707 can be a more complete version of this.
Motivation and Context
See discussion in #3718. Also related to open PR #3707.
Review Time Estimate
Types of changes
Checklist: