Skip to content

This paper develops Epistemic Clientelism Theory, analysing how academic institutions systematically delegate epistemic agency through clientelist exchange. It diagnoses fiduciary breaches, democratic failures, and epistemic injustices, and proposes fiduciary-epistemic governance reforms to restore autonomy and accountability.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Peter-Kahl/Epistemic-Clientelism-Theory

Repository files navigation

Epistemic Clientelism Theory

Power Dynamics and the Delegation of Epistemic Agency in Academia

by Peter Kahl, 2025-07-24; v3: 2025-08-20

Generic badge Generic badge

alt text

Abstract

This paper introduces Epistemic Clientelism Theory (ECT), my original theoretical framework designed explicitly to analyse the systemic delegation of epistemic agency within academic institutions through entrenched political power dynamics. I argue that academic hierarchies institutionalise epistemic clientelism—a strategic yet coerced exchange in which scholars surrender epistemic autonomy to institutional authorities in return for professional recognition, material resources, and symbolic rewards. Building rigorously upon my foundational scholarship, particularly Epistemic Justice and Institutional Responsibility in Academia (2025) and Directors’ Epistemic Duties and Fiduciary Openness (2025), I synthesise fiduciary theory, democratic epistemology, Joseph Raz’s service conception of legitimate authority, Michel Foucault’s critique of disciplinary power/knowledge structures, Martin Heidegger’s authenticity versus institutional alienation, psychological theories of conformity (Milgram, Zimbardo), systems theory, political clientelism literature (Scott, Stokes), and script theory (Schank and Abelson). The analysis explicitly demonstrates how epistemic clientelism constitutes profound fiduciary breaches within academia, systematically marginalises alternative epistemological frameworks, undermines scholarly authenticity, and erodes democratic epistemological practices. To address these entrenched institutional failures, I conclude with assertive fiduciary-epistemic governance reforms explicitly designed to dismantle epistemic clientelism, restore epistemic autonomy, revitalise inclusive and participatory knowledge production, and reassert academia’s fiduciary accountability to truth, fairness, and democratic epistemic ideals.

Keywords

Epistemic Clientelism Theory (ECT), epistemic agency, epistemic autonomy, epistemic justice, fiduciary theory, fiduciary-epistemic governance, fiduciary accountability, power dynamics, academic conformity, democratic epistemology, political epistemology, Joseph Raz, Michel Foucault, Martin Heidegger, psychological conformity, script theory, institutional governance, academic gatekeeping, epistemic marginalisation, knowledge politics, scholarly authenticity, institutional alienation, systems theory, institutional ethics

Working Paper Status

This is a provisional draft circulated for discussion; readers are welcome to cite it, noting that revisions may follow in later versions.

Download

Cite this work

Kahl, P. (2025). Epistemic clientelism theory: Power dynamics and the delegation of epistemic agency in academia (v3). Lex et Ratio Ltd. GitHub: https://github.com/Peter-Kahl/Epistemic-Clientelism-Theory DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27630.88642

Publisher & Licence

First published in Great Britain by Peter Kahl, 2025-07-24.
v3 edition published by Lex et Ratio Ltd on 2025-08-20.

© 2025 Lex et Ratio Ltd. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0.
You may share this work for non-commercial purposes with attribution and without modification.
Licence available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

About

This paper develops Epistemic Clientelism Theory, analysing how academic institutions systematically delegate epistemic agency through clientelist exchange. It diagnoses fiduciary breaches, democratic failures, and epistemic injustices, and proposes fiduciary-epistemic governance reforms to restore autonomy and accountability.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published